|
Replies: 20
| visibility 1,690
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
My Projected Depth Chart
Apr 28, 2014, 10:33 AM
|
|
QB- Cole Stoudt, Deshaun Watson, Nick Schuessler
RB- Wayne Gallman or CJ Davidson, DJ Howard or Zac Brooks OR RB- Wayne Gallman or Tyshon Dye
TE- Stanton Seckinger, Jordan Leggett, Sam Cooper
WR-Adam Humphries, Artavis Scott or Germone Hopper,
WR-Mike Williams, Demarre Kitt
WR-Charone Peake, Kyrin Priester
LT- Isaiah Battle, Joe Gore LT- Isaiah Battle
LG-Eric Maclain, Reid Webster LG-Kalon Davis
C-Jay Guillermo, Ryan Norton or Reid Webster OR C-Jay Guillermo
RG-Ryan Norton, Tyrone Crowder RG-Ryan Norton
RT- Kalon Davis, Maverick Morris RT-Eric Maclain 2nd OL Combo
RE- Vic Beasely, Ebenezer Ogundeko
DT-Grady Jarrett, DJ Reader,Carlos Watkins
DT- Josh Watson, Deshawn Williams
LE- Shaq Lawson, Tavaris Barnes
WLB-Tony Steward, Ben Boulware, Kellen Jones
MLB-Stephone Anthony, Ben Boulware, BJ Goodson
SLB/NB- TJ Burrell or Dorian O’Daniel// Travis Blanks or Martin Jenkins, Korrin Wiggins
CB-Mackenzie Alexander, Adrian Baker
FS- Jayron Kearse or Jadar Johnson, TJ Green
SS-Robert Smith, Korrin Wiggins
CB-Cordrea Tankersley, Garry Peters
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [59]
TigerPulse: 80%
Posts: 62
Joined: 7/29/04
|
Re: My Projected Depth Chart
Apr 28, 2014, 10:46 AM
|
|
Where is Corey Crawford?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: My Projected Depth Chart
Apr 28, 2014, 10:50 AM
|
|
For the GA game, Thats why Crawford, D. Beasely , S. Anthony, and G. Peters arent on there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
You did list Peters though...***
Apr 28, 2014, 10:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: You did list Peters though...***
Apr 28, 2014, 10:56 AM
|
|
forgot to replace him
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: My Projected Depth Chart
Apr 28, 2014, 10:51 AM
[ in reply to Re: My Projected Depth Chart ] |
|
Well i forgot to take Garry off. We will be thin at corner because M. Jenkins isn't healthy and worries me at corner anyway. Lack of experience there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
No way Josh Watson gets the start of Reader or Watkins
Apr 28, 2014, 10:53 AM
|
|
Also you left off corey Crawford (even though he is suspended for game 1)
Otherwise, I'm fine with this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: No way Josh Watson gets the start of Reader or Watkins
Apr 28, 2014, 10:56 AM
|
|
i left off all the GA suspensions except Gary because i forgot to take him off
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Saw that after I posted***
Apr 28, 2014, 10:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: No way Josh Watson gets the start of Reader or Watkins
Apr 28, 2014, 10:57 AM
[ in reply to No way Josh Watson gets the start of Reader or Watkins ] |
|
I think he will, he has extra senior motivation, if all things are equal, he gets the nod because of seniority. I believe that Grady Jarrett is the only one who stands out, the rest are all even on the interior
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Seniority is not a thing, sorry. Talent wins
Apr 28, 2014, 11:24 AM
|
|
Watkins and Reader are not scrubs/freshman. Watkins started last year before his accident
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: Seniority is not a thing, sorry. Talent wins
Apr 28, 2014, 11:27 AM
|
|
There is a good chance he might start strictly because he almost left and Dabo got him to stay. he didnt do that by saying that he could be a second team contributor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Sorry your actually suggesting that a players STARTS because
Apr 28, 2014, 11:29 AM
|
|
he was promised to be able to, even if there is better talent behind him?
lol. okay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: Sorry your actually suggesting that a players STARTS because
Apr 28, 2014, 11:58 AM
|
|
while i dont always agree with the philosophy, i think that if its close the nod goes to the senior who came back. however in this case i believe that there isn't too much separation between the those guys. also i believe this is who will start not who I want to start
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1043]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1423
Joined: 9/7/04
|
Re: My Projected Depth Chart
Apr 28, 2014, 11:04 AM
|
|
Is this just for the UGA game? I notice Crawford, Anthony, and Beasley aren't on there, but Peters is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: My Projected Depth Chart
Apr 28, 2014, 11:26 AM
|
|
yes, i forgot to replace Peters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtuoso [656]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 811
Joined: 8/9/13
|
The only thing I'd change with this is switching
Apr 28, 2014, 11:29 AM
|
|
Seckinger and Leggett. Leggett was outstanding in the Spring Game, and I'd bet he wins the starting job by the end of fall camp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1043]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1423
Joined: 9/7/04
|
Re: The only thing I'd change with this is switching
Apr 28, 2014, 11:39 AM
|
|
I think all 3 Tight Ends play a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtuoso [656]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 811
Joined: 8/9/13
|
Probably, I just feel like Leggett will get the most snaps***
Apr 28, 2014, 11:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1127]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2041
Joined: 1/13/14
|
Re: Probably, I just feel like Leggett will get the most snaps***
Apr 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
|
|
I like Leggett a lot. I think he will have to prove himself in a game before getting a start. They can trust Seck for the most part and to his credit has had some great plays. However, he did have that bad TO against FSU but who played really well on offense against them anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17774]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16663
Joined: 9/1/12
|
Glad to see Peters in***
Apr 28, 2014, 12:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 1,690
|
|
|
50
