Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Coots are out in force this week. They must be nervous about
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 47
| visibility 3,348

Coots are out in force this week. They must be nervous about


Feb 20, 2013, 5:21 PM

LOL you nervous coots?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Coots are out in force this week. They must be nervous about


Feb 20, 2013, 5:26 PM

About?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

all sports. we beat you in basketball, tanner is not the


Feb 20, 2013, 7:33 PM

hc in baseball anymore, and our football team is gaining talent at a faster pace than the chickens are losing it, which is quite an accomplishment, given how fast talent is leaving usuc, not to mention all the asst. coaches that have said screw the 'ol ball sack, and took their talent elsewhere.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: all sports. we beat you in basketball, tanner is not the


Feb 20, 2013, 8:00 PM

Yeah now you just sound dumb, while you try and regain your senses tiger6060 and I will talk about real football stuff below instead of this crazy rant you just Went on that has 0 grounds to stand on. And btw I'm a fact stater, so if you want to know why it's crazy I will be glad to explain.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

please do.


Feb 20, 2013, 8:07 PM

i am waiting.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

hey, jmj212-065135, if you can get back to the computer


Feb 20, 2013, 8:13 PM [ in reply to Re: all sports. we beat you in basketball, tanner is not the ]

i am still waiting for the rebuttal.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: hey, jmj212-065135, if you can get back to the computer


Feb 20, 2013, 8:30 PM

Ok, to start off with, Holbrook is a large part of why tanner became even more successful, look at when CH came and when we started to take it to the next level. I think he will be fine. Not to mention its not like ray isn't right there for advice to be given. On to the talent, you lost a stalwart on the oline, one of the best receivers around who will be higher drafted than anyone from USC this year. So you're also losing talent, and why do you think you are bringing in any more talent, the 247 recruiting rankings for each of us have clemson at 16 and USC at 20. The point difference is a minuscule 737.77 to 734.63.... So obviously the classes are very similar in talent, but wait, the ratings per class are based off of 22 players, for each player you have under that number you just get 0.00 points for, if we signed one more player we would be higher since we only signed 21 and you had 22+.



Now on to the assistant coaches leaving, apparently you missed the memo about Shawn Elliott turning down the oline job at Alabama to stay here, I don't think I need to even address that point further. Basically I just gave facts to completely take away any credibility to anything you just said. I'm not here to cause you to be mad. Just here to talk sports, see below for examples.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

ok,then. if i see you post on t-net tommorrow, i'll reply.


Feb 20, 2013, 8:19 PM [ in reply to Re: all sports. we beat you in basketball, tanner is not the ]

trust me.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: ok,then. if i see you post on t-net tommorrow, i'll reply.


Feb 20, 2013, 8:33 PM

It's there, and btw... Tanner may not be our coach anymore, but Jack is still Clemsons coach and that's not a good thing.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Coots are out in force this week. They must be nervous about


Feb 20, 2013, 5:31 PM

WR and DB corps is a joke. For starters.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Losing over half of you're touted defense


Feb 20, 2013, 5:33 PM

and you're only good receiver.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Losing over half of you're touted defense


Feb 20, 2013, 5:34 PM

Over half.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Losing over half of you're touted defense


Feb 20, 2013, 5:52 PM

Oh you mean the same stuff that happens every year? Nah I'm good.
If our d can survive losing Ingram, Robertson, Gilmore, Paulk, Antonio Allen and cc Whitlock the year before, along with once again our best receiver in alshon, I think we will be fine. But I think I might understand why we should be... Uh nah i don't see it

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 5:53 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 5:59 PM

(crickets, crickets, crickets)

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:03 PM

No crickets, I just come over here and read y'all's news once I've finished reading ours. I like keeping up to date with all websites, helps me know more about what's going on, I mean no ill will, just stating that if anyone that's a USC fan is worried, what I just said should alleviate that fear. It's just like clemson being paranoid about the oline last year and they turned out just fine.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Losing over half of you're touted defense


Feb 20, 2013, 6:01 PM [ in reply to Re: Losing over half of you're touted defense ]

To be technical we lost more two years ago, having to replace 3 veteran oline, 3 cb's,1 veteran DT, 1 first round de, best receiver, veteran lb, star spur safety... So like I said nah, I like our chances. Not to mention not a single starter remained from our db corp from 2011 to 2012 but I still think we did alright. Btw Bruce is a pretty good receiver. He did score two touchdowns in DV?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:07 PM

USC? My bad I thought we were talking about scar.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:11 PM

See, typical response, I'm just talking logical but instead of having a real conversation, we go with the non-sense. Ha,

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:18 PM

Put it this way we stop #7 we win and I think I. Battle is up for the challenge also our D was veryyyyyy bad and you scored 27.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:23 PM

That was last year, anything can happen this year, who knows. Y'all's offense was also great and you only scored 17. Double edged sword, and spurriers plan wasn't to score a ton of points, it was to grind the clock away, and that was extremely effective. Like the age old game of keep away.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:27 PM

Your D was great ill give credit. Also never got in rythem and when the O does its unstopable ask lsu. Also on a serious point can you project your OL right now jw? (serious question).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 6:39 PM

Our o line lost one starter, tj Johnson at center, he will be replaced by more likely than not Cody Waldrop... Which they say he is just a mean strong country kid mauler so hopefully that will be nice. He's roughly 315 now, the two tackles will be 6'8 335 Corey Robinson and 6'6 330 Brandon Shell. Guards will AJ Cann and Ronald Patrick who are more around the 6'3 315 range. All 4 started last year, line should do nothing but improve from this year to last. Tbh I can give my personal opinion on any group if you ever want, they are usually accurate and very unbiased.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 7:13 PM

Sounds about like our OL only lose one will be replaced by a real blue collar guy and we will have depth at the position for the first time in a long time. Will matulis kinda fall because of injurys?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 7:35 PM

There's talk about matulis if he can come back strong playing OT and moving shell to tackle but honestly I think that's unlikely. Robinson if he keeps proving he can get it done is entrenched at LT and is a physical monster. Cody Gibson the other ol that didn't play from injury is getting a look at tight end from a blocking perspective. He's also catching passes in the offseason and is showing good hands considering

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 7:40 PM

I gotcha , who starts at QB week one and a second question who starts around the week of the Tenn. game?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 7:52 PM

Shaw and Shaw, not saying I will agree. But barring injury I think shaw will still get the nod, he probably does give us the best chance to win. The question is how strong will Nosovitch and Mitch push Dylan this spring. Those two have talent.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 7:57 PM

Saw mitch behide thurmond center throwing balls into trash cans pretty good. Im a Tiger trapped hah.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:04 PM

Oh ####, yeah he looks great IMO. I'm from batesburg so I frequent Columbia but my closest friend is a tiger, go up to clemson and have fun with them all the same... But if someone said who will you pull for when clemson plays Georgia I would still respond an earthquake. Lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Losing over half of you're touted defense


Feb 20, 2013, 8:02 PM

Didn't Thuginger start last year?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Losing over half of you're touted defense


Feb 20, 2013, 8:18 PM

What's that got to do with who we lost the year before?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: all sports. we beat you in basketball, tanner is not the


Feb 20, 2013, 8:03 PM

No mitch really does throw footballs in trash cans on the intermural fields...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:06 PM

Haha I understand. Can I get a unc scar scored prediction? (I know its early)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:16 PM

I'm going along the lines of 28-14 USC or maybe 35-21 USC just off what I know now. Subject to change.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:19 PM

I can see that forsure.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:31 PM

See how cordial I am with you but sgttiger up above wont think so because I can't stand people spewing random nonsense with nothing to back it up.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:35 PM

Ehhh just be cool you will earn respect with true football talk ya know.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:37 PM

Oh I was cool, see the thing with me is. I will give all the credit in the world to opposing teams, even clemson but I will also tell you what I think they could to to dramatically improve.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:39 PM

Fair points and I feel the same way toward scar and other teams.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:42 PM

Like for the life of me I cannot figure out why clemson is not recruiting any offensive line, signing 1-2 a year is just idiotic, it will catch up eventually and that's incredibly hard to reverse the effects of.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:46 PM

Look back at 2012 signed 3 really good ones all RS only lost one and signed 2 this year 2013 the 5th best OG in the nation and have one for 2014 on board with looking to sign 1-2 more. Amd we only lose 2 after the 2013 season but injurys and a small class in 2009 really hurt iver the past 2 years.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:55 PM

Yeah but jeeze, I mean this past year it was worrisome who was gonna be starting on the line, we've hit 5 a year pretty much the past few years and are still going after no less than 3 this coming year. It's just so easy to have them not work out, get hurt, and it's nice to be able to use multiple lines per game with little to no fall off.

That's been a strength of USC's Dline lately, they alternate first and second string every few series with little to no drop off. If you can get that way with an oline, watch out world.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 8:57 PM

Yeah Depth is huge with this past class Clemson finally has it along the lines at the DT postion big time. But OL for us has been tough but its getting help now more than ever.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So why are you on tnet?***


Feb 20, 2013, 9:28 PM

Yeah, I can agree with that, it just seems they focus a lot less on it than others to me.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My eyes are bleeding


Feb 20, 2013, 9:40 PM

from all the Re:

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

why are you even on this site?***


Feb 20, 2013, 9:45 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: My eyes are bleeding


Feb 21, 2013, 3:39 PM [ in reply to My eyes are bleeding ]

Lol, yeah I noticed that, it was an enjoyable convo about football though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: My eyes are bleeding


Feb 21, 2013, 3:41 PM

Agree

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 47
| visibility 3,348
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic