|
Replies: 10
| visibility 3,344
|
110%er [8501]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5274
Joined: 9/7/09
|
Moving Sammy to boundry WR is a bad idea for 2 reasons
Apr 5, 2013, 6:56 PM
|
|
1. At today's prices it's fiscally irresponsible to up our demand for gun powder for use in the cannon.
B. By the fourth quarter our mascots will be falling out like a bunch of LSU defensive linemen - or as it's more appropriately termed "the Bayou Bellyflop".
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [55374]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58381
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: Moving Sammy to boundry WR is a bad idea for 2 reasons
Apr 5, 2013, 7:28 PM
|
|
Well it's a good thing they use shot gun shells huh....
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7565
Joined: 1/1/11
|
No need to worry about #2 "B"
Apr 5, 2013, 7:55 PM
|
|
we always have 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [908]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2247
Joined: 11/27/07
|
Reminds me of saving private ryan - this whole war is a
Apr 5, 2013, 8:38 PM
|
|
misallocation of resources. Give me a rifle and put me within 1000 yards of Hitler. Pack your bags, wars over boys.
Something along those lines. This is the way to gripe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93650]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95406
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Did you say something about Shaving Ryan's Privates?
Apr 5, 2013, 10:21 PM
|
|
Dood, that stuff belongs in the lunge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12538]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12247
Joined: 11/21/11
|
What does that mean? He only runs pass routes to the
Apr 5, 2013, 10:04 PM
|
|
sideline?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8501]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5274
Joined: 9/7/09
|
Re: What does that mean? He only runs pass routes to the
Apr 5, 2013, 10:25 PM
|
|
It means he'll lineup in Nuk's old spot nearest the sideline. If they want to double team him (which they'll have to) they'll have to slide another DB out wide. It'll leave a significant portion of the field open for the likes of Peake, Bryant, Humphries, hopper, etc etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12538]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12247
Joined: 11/21/11
|
Thanks, sounds like a good plan. I want Sammy to have
Apr 5, 2013, 10:29 PM
|
|
another season like his freshman year. Having said that, I will say that when he was able to play in games last year, he still had some vdry big plays. A lot of people forget osme of his big plays this past season because his overall season was no comparison to his freshman year. Thanks again for explaining the new position he will have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
It will do that, too, if the D commits a safety to cover
Apr 6, 2013, 10:11 AM
|
|
him. You could say it will soften up the whole middle of the field. If they try to cover him 1-on-1 that'll be a lot of easy catches. It really wouldn't be much of an issue if we didn't have such talent at every position. For opposing D Coordinators, it's gonna be a matter of pick your poison.
All we need for a very memorable season is our own D to step it up from last year. I, for one, expect our D to be very much improved. Clemson's coming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15525]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21413
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: Moving Sammy to boundry WR is a bad idea for 2 reasons
Apr 5, 2013, 11:00 PM
|
|
I was all ready to TD this post, but then I read it, and I got it. You are all over it. TU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 3,344
|
|
|
50
