Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Maybe i wasn’t right, but I thought Louisville would give us a tougher challenge
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 1

Maybe i wasn’t right, but I thought Louisville would give us a tougher challenge


Nov 14, 2022, 10:58 AM

Even with their starting QB situation with Cunningham being our second half, their players were tiny compared to ours

It reminded me of when we suited up against NC State…. Tiny players

Louisville just wasn’t that good at all

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It helped that they faced a defense playing lights out


Nov 14, 2022, 11:04 AM

for the most part.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I was surprised at how bad the UL playcalling was


Nov 14, 2022, 11:05 AM

They could have done more to get Cunningham out in the open (where I thought Clemson was most vulnerable). Clemson played much better than I expected them too as well.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Re: Maybe i wasn’t right, but I thought Louisville would give us a tougher challenge


Nov 14, 2022, 11:05 AM

Without the turnovers, this would have been a blow out

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson has to stop turning the ####### ball over.


Nov 14, 2022, 11:07 AM

How many potential INTs did Clemson drop? 3?

GET THE BALL!

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's something in these hills.


Maybe not big or highly talented overall BUT..


Nov 14, 2022, 11:06 AM

mighty scrappy!

Their QB was their main weapon & he was skimpy from the start & injured last play of half.

Game over!

badge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonorlightbulbbill.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Cunningham not being healthy hurt them a lot.


Nov 14, 2022, 11:12 AM

Reminded me of when we had Woody Dantzler. He was dangerous when healthy, but when he was hobbled we were a totally different team and very limited.

Even in the first half, Cunningham was clearly limited by injury. The backup QB in the second half was solid, but not the same type of player.

I was also really pleased with our defense. We played with a lot of intensity.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Re: Cunningham not being healthy hurt them a lot.


Nov 14, 2022, 11:22 AM

Spot on. You could tell they were protecting him. In hindsight, I'm sure they wish they'd started the backup and game planning all week with him.

Also reminds me of cuse game in 17 when we had a gimpy kb2.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Maybe i wasn’t right, but I thought Louisville would give us a tougher challenge


Nov 14, 2022, 11:50 AM

The only problem I had with our play was the linebacker for Louisville that kept getting through our line untouched.

After the first couple of times we should have found some way to account for him.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 8
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Meeting my mother for the first time

by Clemsonohiotiger®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic