Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Louisville 4th down "time out"
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 9
| visibility 2,472

Louisville 4th down "time out"


Oct 15, 2014, 7:35 AM

Has it been reported why they got so much time after spiking the ball on third down at the end?

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Remember that these are the same clown refs that...


Oct 15, 2014, 8:54 AM

said Hopper's catch on the sidelines was a "juggle" even though all 82k of us clearly saw an NFL worthy catch on the video board. This was one of the worst officiating crews I can remember. Ron Cherry would have been an upgrade!

GO TIGERS!!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How do you keep Gamecocks out of your yard?
• Put up goal posts
What does a Gamecock grad call a Clemson Tiger grad in 2 years?
• Boss


there was no clear shot on the video board that could


Oct 15, 2014, 9:14 AM

overturn that call; I've now watched the replay and there is no evidence there to overturn. Hopper turns his back to the camera on every view shown; it no longer becomes a question of the foot touching or not, he had time to regrip the ball after the foot touch even if you are convinced the foot touched. The official that ruled it incomplete had a view that the cameras didn't have and that official was in proper position and didn't hesitate.

Now the extra timeout...I'm still mad and confused about-- someone does need to explain

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You should see the review that were on TV.


Oct 15, 2014, 9:23 AM

He pinned that ball to his shoulder and held it when he had both feet on the ground. As his momentum carried him out of bounds he moved the ball into the center of his body to make sure it didn't come out when he hit the ground.

He never lost control of the ball. This one is on the guys feeding replays to the booth. That's the second time in the last few weeks that the booth hasn't gotten the right angle to consider for their decision.

The ref right in front of the play was looking at the feet instead of the ball. That's why they review the play.


Message was edited by: ClemsonTiger1988®
2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You should see the review that were on TV.


Oct 15, 2014, 10:43 AM

So you think you saw more angles at home than the officials deciding to overturn the call or not?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

dude- I watched the replay of the game(I DVR'd); I was also


Oct 15, 2014, 11:58 AM [ in reply to You should see the review that were on TV. ]

at the game(close down on that side) and was watching the official that ruled it incomplete. The replay does not show a Hill EZ toward midfield shot down the line. The official who ruled it incomplete was not the guy up by Hopper, it was the Side Judge who is on the line and came running up to rule it incomplete using a juggle signal. That is the only view to know if Hopper regripped or bobbled the ball after his foot touched.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There was no "juggling" per the TV replays


Oct 15, 2014, 9:32 AM [ in reply to Remember that these are the same clown refs that... ]

Only question was IF he got his right toe in bounds. I say yes but it was a tough call to reverse once made.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Remember that these are the same clown refs that...


Oct 15, 2014, 9:34 AM [ in reply to Remember that these are the same clown refs that... ]

That was one of those calls where whatever the original call was, it was would stand. Had it been ruled a completion first, that would have stood too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Louisville 4th down "time out"


Oct 15, 2014, 10:49 AM

I think we might have called time out once they spiked it and stopped the clock to make sure we had the right personnel on the field and the right formation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

no TO signaled, no TO came of the board, reportedly


Oct 15, 2014, 12:01 PM

based on this board, Dabo was asked post-game and indicated they didn't call timeout and was told clock operator error which makes absolutely no sense---- this question needs to be addressed by the league-- it looked like an inexcusable error by the officials with the game on the line

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 9
| visibility 2,472
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...138 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic