|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
1st Rounder [608]
TigerPulse: 75%
Posts: 384
Joined: 6/28/15
|
Feaster not in new rivals top 100.
Jan 18, 2016, 3:03 PM
|
|
Why did he fall so far?
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [93668]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95419
Joined: 12/25/09
|
He wouldn't take a bribe and commit to an SEC team.
Jan 18, 2016, 3:05 PM
|
|
It's not as if he suddenly lost any ability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: He wouldn't take a bribe and commit to an SEC team.
Jan 18, 2016, 6:33 PM
|
|
His ability to create his own space ...especially catching short passes out of the backfield , in our offense ?
OMG , just wait .
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Re: Feaster not in new rivals top 100.
Jan 18, 2016, 3:06 PM
|
|
He was hurt and didn't have a great shrine bowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [608]
TigerPulse: 75%
Posts: 384
Joined: 6/28/15
|
Ahh ok. Appreciate it woods.
Jan 18, 2016, 3:07 PM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58415]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46323
Joined: 4/23/00
|
And was a no-show at the Army All Star game.
Jan 18, 2016, 3:09 PM
[ in reply to Re: Feaster not in new rivals top 100. ] |
|
He sustained a cut inside his mouth and never touched the ball. Post season was rough for him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [243]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 75
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Keeping It Real
Jan 27, 2011, 3:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: Feaster not in new rivals top 100. ] |
|
Rivals bumped several of our guys up a lot, so I don't think there is any bias going on. Powell certainly showed out in the Shrine Bowl. However, does anyone really think there are 100 better prospects than Feaster? I guess he got banged up and worn down this season, but the elite talent is still there. In the Shrine Bowl you could see the great quickness and burst at times, even though he got not blocking. Maybe he showed a lack of toughness fighting through injuries in the bowl games. Can't say he shouldn't be dropped, but lets keep things in perspective. He still has a rare combo of speed, quickness and receiving abilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1330]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2226
Joined: 8/6/14
|
Re: Feaster not in new rivals top 100.
Jan 18, 2016, 6:12 PM
[ in reply to Re: Feaster not in new rivals top 100. ] |
|
Still think he's going to have major injury concerns while at Clemson. He's been injured his whole high school career
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [495]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 683
Joined: 8/21/05
|
Laying low. Next year's secret weapon.
Jan 18, 2016, 3:12 PM
|
|
It ain't Rivals that makes you a great player, alhtough they like to think that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5085]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5134
Joined: 11/9/09
|
I like our chances.***
Jan 18, 2016, 5:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: I like our chances.***
Jan 18, 2016, 6:15 PM
|
|
Because he was overrated. Rivals had him too high, then dropped him too low because of extenuating circumstances.
He's dang good imo, and can be great, but will he developed the toughness needed to be as good as he possibly can be? We will see. His ceiling is as has as anyone because of physical ability, but it seems like scouts have recognized that his mentality on contacts will have to change for that to happen.
Glad to have him for sure tho
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [188]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 474
Joined: 4/25/14
|
Re: I like our chances.***
Jan 18, 2016, 6:17 PM
|
|
Contact*
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6680]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 9739
Joined: 9/22/11
|
Had better Jr. year than Sr. - heard he had nagging injuries***
Jan 18, 2016, 6:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: Had better Jr. year than Sr. - heard he had nagging injuries***
Jan 18, 2016, 6:29 PM
|
|
Beast . Will be fantastic in CU orange . Bank it .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3194]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 3543
Joined: 11/21/11
|
Kinda crazy they base his performance on 1 game
Jan 18, 2016, 6:30 PM
|
|
The kid can play some football and has proven that during his hs career. During his junior season he had over 1000 yds rushing, 1000 yds receiving and 15 tds which put him as a 5 star RB by just about all recruiting services. During his senior year, his stats were almost identical to his jr year but had 7 more total tds and was named SC player of year all while playing with an injury but yet he gets dropped bc of his performance at ONE game. I just don't understand it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15492]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18413
Joined: 12/10/14
|
Re: Feaster not in new rivals top 100.
Jan 18, 2016, 6:46 PM
|
|
There must be some mistake on rivals.com. When you pull Feaster's profile he's rated a 6.0 and #1 in the state but has 'no rating' in either Position or National. You can't be a 6 with no national or position rating. He didn't play in the all-am bowl but he didn't kill anyone's dog either.
Somebody needs to call those bastiges up to fix it. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
