|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1292
Joined: 10/28/09
|
should some of the eye candy/motion be added back?
Sep 18, 2015, 10:55 AM
|
|
should some of the eye candy/motion be added back in to the offense? I thought Morris used it to much and got to gimmicky at times but a lot of worked and kept the defense honest and guessing until the ball was snapped and it was to late for the defense to adjust. I know Elliot/Scott talked about simplifying and using it less but they have almost gotten rid of it entirely. Should they incorporate some back in to the system in the long break between now and ND? What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
YES!
Sep 18, 2015, 10:58 AM
|
|
!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [75683]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 108835
Joined: 10/26/03
|
1. learn how to use the word too.
Sep 18, 2015, 11:00 AM
|
|
2. They should not add it back in if the current crop of players aren't good at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2438]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1295
Joined: 6/13/11
|
I thought he used it way to much....***
Sep 18, 2015, 11:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15730]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 17365
Joined: 2/1/99
|
I see what you did their. ******
Sep 18, 2015, 12:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1292
Joined: 10/28/09
|
Re: 1. learn how to use the word too.
Sep 18, 2015, 11:08 AM
[ in reply to 1. learn how to use the word too. ] |
|
> 2. They should not add it back in if the current
> crop of players aren't good at it.
if the current players aren't good at it??!!?? What??
It takes almost zero talent for a kid to move from one spot to another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [75683]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 108835
Joined: 10/26/03
|
I believe all that motion and
Sep 18, 2015, 11:09 AM
|
|
getting lined back up right is a wee bit more complicated than you are thinking it is. You've also got to have linemen sit still that long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [804]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1292
Joined: 10/28/09
|
Re: I believe all that motion and
Sep 18, 2015, 11:26 AM
|
|
our guys had no problem running it the past 4 years and with the exception Hyatt and couple of the true freshmen receivers they've all run it before in our system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: should some of the eye candy/motion be added back?
Sep 18, 2015, 11:01 AM
|
|
Yes the play calling has been very predictable so far. I hope it's because of all the youth but it's def got to open up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [982]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 1955
Joined: 12/28/14
|
Re: should some of the eye candy/motion be added back?
Sep 18, 2015, 11:06 AM
|
|
Yes!You have Scott,Renfro,and Mccloud. They all have enough speed to make the defense play honest. Our offense looks predictable and over simplified.This is not the Chad Morris offense. No way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1921]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2516
Joined: 6/18/01
|
Poor pass protection is our problem
Sep 18, 2015, 11:05 AM
|
|
We need to block better not use more trick plays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Pre-snap motion is not a "trick" play.
Sep 18, 2015, 11:06 AM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Does it improve pass protection?
Sep 18, 2015, 11:09 AM
|
|
He's right. Pass protection is our problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11145]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14027
Joined: 9/2/03
|
It can when it changes LBs and DEs pre-snap reads. If
Sep 18, 2015, 11:16 AM
|
|
you're an LB and have a blitz called and suddenly you have to account for a TE that's moved over, you change your call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11478]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9412
Joined: 10/3/12
|
It can.
Sep 18, 2015, 11:16 AM
[ in reply to Does it improve pass protection? ] |
|
If a defensive end has to hold his position because of the threat of jet sweep motion or the orbit motion, then the pass rush gets to Watson a little more slowly. It also gives our oline a chance to get into position.
The other thing it can do is mess with the DB's eyes and allow receivers to get open more quickly. This part makes the pass protection less important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111421]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73687
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: should some of the eye candy/motion be added back?
Sep 18, 2015, 11:06 AM
|
|
Just having watson, scott and gallman line up is all the eye candy we need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
