|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [10457]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11556
Joined: 6/29/01
|
I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 3:13 PM
|
|
Oklahoma and would not have to play them in Dallas. Job well, done committee and ESPN.
Who in their right mind thinks Mich St. would be favored over Oklahoma on a neutral field?
Are we the number one seed or is Alabama?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1929]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 2510
Joined: 8/30/14
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 3:18 PM
|
|
Make no mistake, ALABAMA IS ALWAYS #1, they just "let" others THINK they are #1 like when they need to keep their baby Bama safe by making them #2. Makes perfect sense doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 3:19 PM
|
|
Yeah it looks like they want a Oklahoma -Alabama matchup in the championship.
You guys got a raw deal for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5496]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5412
Joined: 3/9/11
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 3:27 PM
|
|
Alabama is #2, as they should since they are nothing but a #2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [24]
TigerPulse: 30%
Posts: 39
Joined: 8/12/08
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 3:50 PM
|
|
MSU just beat the fourth ranked team while OU didn't play. They deserved to jump to 3. Jeez
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2430]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3245
Joined: 11/11/11
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:03 PM
|
|
We've heard all season about the eye test. Heard last half of season how good Oklahoma is. Not so much talk on Michigan st. You're just happy Bama got the easiest game
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2663]
TigerPulse: 76%
Posts: 4303
Joined: 1/4/07
|
Just stop. It's embarrassing. MSU will give Alabama
Dec 6, 2015, 5:03 PM
|
|
everything they can handle. Big 10 defenses are designed to stop run-heavy offenses. If anything, Alabama got the worst matchup by far. Heck, we're getting to play a team we destroyed last year in a bowl game. Did the committee not do us an enormous favor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:19 PM
[ in reply to Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play ] |
|
It's obvious what was done and you know it. Little Nicky & staff have no answer for a good spread offense & the sec is just being given the best chance sinerio to make it to the final.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1904]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1573
Joined: 10/14/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1369]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1257
Joined: 9/7/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:04 PM
|
|
Clemson and Oklahoma are the best teams in the top 4. We beat them again and it doesn't matter what bama does. They have nothing but a one dimensional offense & a defense with no answer for DW4. Let em pamper their little sec guys, it's going to make it that much sweeter winning the natty by stoning the sec's best
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [651]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 1272
Joined: 1/12/01
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:11 PM
|
|
If we're planning on winning the whole thing I would rather play Oklahoma first. We got almost a month to prepare for them instead of a week. National champ is the winner of our game
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:14 PM
|
|
You're dead-on bro. Good call....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [24]
TigerPulse: 30%
Posts: 39
Joined: 8/12/08
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play ] |
|
I see you have watched Bama about as much as I have watched Clemson. Clemson hasn't seen a defense like Bama's which has the best and deepest D line in CFB. You can down play that all you want but you wont convince me otherwise. The secondary gives up big plays from time to time but still pretty nasty of a defense whereas Clemson D gave up over 30 points to Usuc and unc. I don't see you guys or any other team running up and down the field on this D anymore this year. But hey that's jmo and that's why we play the game right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10134]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8862
Joined: 7/20/12
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:26 PM
|
|
We all know how Bama has seen spectacular offenses? Florida, LSU, Ole ####???? Let me know when Bama plays a team with an actual pulse offensively. By the way the only team Bama has played with a pulse is ole ####. Look how that turned out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18284
Joined: 10/28/15
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play ] |
|
It hurts to agree with a Bama feller over fellow Tigers but we sound like a bunch of ###### pansies. Bring on Oklahoma. We'll beat them. Then we will see how we match up with Bama IF they beat MSU. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the Trojans by the way. Where I do disagree with the Bama feller and I watch a lot of your games is that you do struggle with the spread. So I think it makes for an intriguing matchup. Let's get it on! Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3710]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4264
Joined: 8/20/10
|
And FSU held UF to 2 points while you let them have 2 TDs
Dec 6, 2015, 4:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play ] |
|
So sounds like we faced a pretty good defense, one that actually had a better score than yours and FSU played them at home.
So take that and stuff your SEC pipe with it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:51 PM
[ in reply to Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play ] |
|
Good try. Bama's secondary looks like they're stuck in mud & your "great" defense has no answer for a mobile QB. All you have on offense is Henry & your offense can't score enough to keep up with an offense that can make you play in space and score on you. Keep trying, but if you're gonna run it you need to get your information from somewhere besides ESPN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18284
Joined: 10/28/15
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 4:16 PM
|
|
I disagree. I think it is a fair playoff. I'm not skeered of Oklahoma. They lost to a bad Texas team and we stomped them last year. Michigan State lost a close one barely and deserved to move up IMO bc Oklahoma was idle and MSU beat the #4 ranked undefeated Iowa team. I'd rather play Oklahoma myself. Now we have to quit acting like we are afraid. Lots of trolls coming. To be the best we have to beat the best. Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [231]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 344
Joined: 3/11/13
|
Doesn't matter who would be favored
Dec 6, 2015, 5:19 PM
|
|
between Oklahoma and Mich St. If you're ranking by who is favored, then it's 1)Bama 2)Okla 3)Clemson 4)Mich St. Still get the same matchups. Mich St should be ahead of Oklahoma. Mich St beat 4 teams in the final top 15 (5,7,14,15) Oklahoma beat 4 of top 23 (11,16,17,23). Both had a bad loss. The real question is if Mich St should be ahead of Bama. Still would get the same matchups in that case too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [312]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 482
Joined: 9/26/06
|
Re: Doesn't matter who would be favored
Dec 6, 2015, 5:58 PM
|
|
Bama should be #4 they beat no one this year. And had a loss to Ole sis. Worst body of work of the 4 teams in the playoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [24]
TigerPulse: 30%
Posts: 39
Joined: 8/12/08
|
Re: Doesn't matter who would be favored
Dec 6, 2015, 6:19 PM
|
|
You guys sound like Bama doesn't belong in the playoff. Like we have never seen a mobile QB? Maybe you guys are right and Bama is overrated. Maybe Bama dominates the next two games playing there brand of fb. As far as spread teams go Bama is much better defending than they were two years ago., a whole new approach that has been working better. I think all four teams have their strengths and weaknesses but it will be the one that brings it that wins it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [419]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 495
Joined: 9/17/14
|
Re: I see the committee made sure Alabama would not have to play
Dec 6, 2015, 5:47 PM
|
|
They're just trying to make sure their precious wammers get into the championship. They want them to have one more win before they lose to us!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4896]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5278
Joined: 8/24/11
|
Won't matter - if AL had played OK, OK would win. I'd
Dec 6, 2015, 6:00 PM
|
|
rather get the extra time prepping for OK. We beat them I think our next game will be a lot easier whether it's AL or Sparty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1944]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2463
Joined: 8/2/15
|
Re: Won't matter - if AL had played OK, OK would win. I'd
Dec 6, 2015, 6:06 PM
|
|
^^^^NAILED IT!!!!^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
