|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,530
|
All-In [26503]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20642
Joined: 9/2/02
|
How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 12:42 PM
|
|
I think McCullough is a better fit at the position.
Seems Leggett could create some matchup problems for CB's.
Leggett doesn't have TE bulk ... he's pretty lean.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [22387]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31281
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Leggett can be a great tight end.
Sep 26, 2014, 12:45 PM
|
|
But it doesn't matter what position he plays if he can't put in the work and doesn't give great effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
#lazyleggett***
Sep 26, 2014, 12:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 12:46 PM
|
|
At 6'6 250, he's big enough. He just doesn't block like he is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12208]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 20772
Joined: 2/13/05
|
Re: How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 1:35 PM
|
|
Looks like Tarzan plays like Jane. Seen many players like him that had the body and talent, but for whatever reason were just soft.
It is what it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111558]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73748
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 12:47 PM
|
|
slow, but when we split our tight ends out in Morris' system, it creates said match-up problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [75717]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 108847
Joined: 10/26/03
|
He needs to focus on coaching baseball.
Sep 26, 2014, 12:58 PM
|
|
He can think more about hobbies in a few years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83113]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80156
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Slow***
Sep 26, 2014, 1:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Slow***
Sep 26, 2014, 1:18 PM
|
|
I appreciate SLOW being a problem - but at 6'5"+, how dang fast does he really need to be? If our QB can throw it to him, and throw it high enough, the defenders are going to have fits trying to defend it. JMO - I'd use him at WR in a heartbeat. JL was supposed to be a huge factor for us this year, and has barely been used. Sad really. Wasted opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [334]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 349
Joined: 7/11/05
|
He lacks one crutial element
Sep 26, 2014, 1:29 PM
|
|
He doesn't have a mean streak. There is no aggression in his blocking what so ever. Whether its effort or what, I'm not sure, but I've yet to see that killer instinct out of JL and that has been what has disappointed me the most about him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2744
Joined: 6/12/11
|
Re: How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 1:26 PM
|
|
He'd be a leg up on the competition. ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2744
Joined: 6/12/11
|
Re: How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 1:27 PM
|
|
He'd be a leg up on the competition. ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [261]
TigerPulse: 22%
Posts: 2073
Joined: 8/12/13
|
Re: How would Leggett be at WR?
Sep 26, 2014, 1:54 PM
|
|
I thought he was up to 251.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9028]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7378
Joined: 4/9/11
|
He doesn't start @ TE, why would he be a WR?***
Sep 26, 2014, 2:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,530
|
|
|
50
