|
Replies: 55
| visibility 1
|
Amateur [33]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 53
Joined: 2/28/14
|
Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 9, 2014, 6:11 PM
|
|
I hate when SC fans act like he folded against good teams using SC as the only example. They never acknowledge his performances against LSU, Ohio St., Georgia, Auburn, etc.
But he sucked against carolina. 
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [53713]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43532
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Because, at least one of those years, we had the worst D in
Jun 9, 2014, 6:17 PM
|
|
Clemson history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10900
Joined: 9/17/07
|
How did Charlie go 4-0 against them?***
Jun 9, 2014, 6:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1351]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1025
Joined: 9/16/05
|
Re: How did Charlie go 4-0 against them?***
Jun 10, 2014, 1:42 PM
|
|
Charlie was a great QB. Very poised and had a nice touch on the ball. I don't understand this post really. The man has been a professional QB for several years. Granted he hasn't started much, but he is still a professional.
To answer the initial question regarding Boyd.... He went 0-3 because he just played poorly against them. He got behind in some and tried to force things. Others he was just being crushed by Clowney and crew. Also I think the Gameschmucks QB's just played better, their coaches coached better. Its all a mental thing from my point of view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [119553]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 54412
Joined: 6/24/09
|
Why don't you tell us, dirtpecker?***
Jun 9, 2014, 6:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36448]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
Found one^^^***
Jun 9, 2014, 6:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58367]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46305
Joined: 4/23/00
|
There were several reasons, depending on which year you're
Jun 9, 2014, 6:26 PM
|
|
talking about, but the common factor, in my opinion, was their superiority on both lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24660]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42324
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Previous....***
Jun 9, 2014, 6:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [33]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 53
Joined: 2/28/14
|
Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're
Jun 9, 2014, 6:30 PM
[ in reply to There were several reasons, depending on which year you're ] |
|
> talking about, but the common factor, in my opinion,
> was their superiority on both lines.
A good answer. Most simpletons here automatically just assume I'm trolling as a ####. But you got to the point I was trying to make.
They lose 3/4 starters on the DLine which has been their main advantage these past few years. The one returning starter is a guy I've never heard of.
Thompson is going to be eating a lot of dirt this time around, I'm really excited about our front 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36448]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're
Jun 9, 2014, 6:36 PM
|
|
Only problem w that is their D line won't effect DT eating dirt. The lack of depth and experience will help Cole Stout make plays.
But Lamecocks OLine will be very good this year. So will our D line. It is going to be a battle for sure.
On the contrary out O line may not be amazing an neither is their D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1052]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1977
Joined: 7/8/13
|
Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're
Jun 9, 2014, 7:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're ] |
|
USuC did not dominate the offensive or defensive line last year. In fact, Spurrier admitted his self that he kept calling qb draws bc we controlled the line of scrimmage. Also, R McDowell averaged better than 8.5 ypc against them. Two years ago is a different story.
Tajh Boyd is not the best qb in Clemson history. For those who say he his, he's not. Was he the qb with the best receivers and offensive coordinator in Clemson history? Probably. All parties during his tenure, 0-4 against USuC.
It's no simple theory as to how we(tajh) were 0-4 with him as qb. But I firmly believe it is coaching.
Steve Spurrier is a better football coach than Dabo and everybody on this board knows it and hates it, and won't admit it. Would Steve Spurrier have beaten USuC last year if he was the coach at Clemson? Absolutely.
Would Connor Shaw have beaten USuC if he was the qb at Clemson last year? The thought has occurred to me.
Clemson had better players, facilities, and coordinators than USuC the past two years. Getting the players ready to play is the HC job, and simply put they were not, and 6 turnovers is exhibit A.
Turn me down fellas. I'm gonna go have dinner with my smokin hot 24 year old gf and worry about my tiger pulse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
You robbin the cradle like me? lol***
Jun 9, 2014, 11:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert [1376]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 1467
Joined: 3/25/13
|
Lots of BS in that post...
Jun 10, 2014, 2:01 PM
[ in reply to Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're ] |
|
Couple quick points..
Dabo is doing considerably better after 5 years than Sack was 5 years into his 3rd head coaching job.
And, THERE IS NO WAY Sack beats Clemson of his team had 6 turnovers. In fact, if we had a few less and certainly of 6-0 in reverse, then we beat the #### out of the coots.
There's a lot more BS in your post too. We can discuss later if needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15499]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21400
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: There were several reasons, depending on which year you're
Jun 9, 2014, 6:35 PM
[ in reply to There were several reasons, depending on which year you're ] |
|
The trenches, especially our OL's inability to run-block has been a huge reason we have struggled. We seem to be fixing that in a big way and focusing on the trenches, both OL and DL, and it will pay us big dividends. That has been the missing piece of the puzzle, IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1047]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1594
Joined: 11/17/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17577]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11050
Joined: 10/13/08
|
I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.
Jun 9, 2014, 6:32 PM
|
|
-1. Enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [33]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 53
Joined: 2/28/14
|
Re: I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.
Jun 9, 2014, 6:39 PM
|
|
> -1. Enjoy.
lmao, you're internet points have no power here. You're welcome to actually join in on some meaningful conversation though.
I think we easily have the upper hand this year, playing at home, and they are very inexperienced along their DLine, something they aren't used to and something that has been very advantageous to them in our games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17577]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11050
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Meaningful? "We"?
Jun 9, 2014, 8:35 PM
|
|
Loser.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
Posts: 1346
Joined: 1/2/13
|
Re: I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.
Jun 9, 2014, 6:52 PM
[ in reply to I save all of my TD's for Coots like you. ] |
|
Do you get a limited number of TDs if you pay? I feel like if you pay, although you obviously should only get to TD a specific post once, you should be able to TD as many posts as you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: I save all of my TD's for Coots like you.
Jun 10, 2014, 11:00 AM
|
|
You are another #### loving loser like the OP congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1198]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 1876
Joined: 6/13/99
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 9, 2014, 6:37 PM
|
|
SC had their best years in school history during those three years, not just the best three years in a row but the best three years ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [13]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 60
Joined: 7/1/11
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 4:06 PM
|
|
Clemson had their best 3 years as well, that's a wash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 4:49 PM
|
|
Not even close #### lover.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 9, 2014, 6:48 PM
|
|
IMO - it was COACHING and a whole lot of luck for the chickens. The law of averages finally caught up with us, and even though we are the better team, they managed to pull off 5 upsets. 
Pretty good - huh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40868]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42926
Joined: 11/30/98
|
obvious coot troll is obvious
Jun 9, 2014, 6:56 PM
|
|
effin loser
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [82969]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80112
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Fuller was 3-0***
Jun 9, 2014, 7:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [785]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 2898
Joined: 9/22/04
|
Re: Fuller was 3-0***
Jun 9, 2014, 8:23 PM
|
|
For all you youngsters out there:
1. SteveFuller
2. Homer Jordan
3. Woodrow Dantzler
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51524]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43075
Joined: 8/10/04
|
4. Charlie Whitehurst***
Jun 9, 2014, 8:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6650]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 9722
Joined: 9/22/11
|
clowney had him psyched out in last 2 meetings.***
Jun 9, 2014, 8:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [61436]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39563
Joined: 12/16/01
|
Kind of like Tanner/Holbrooke and Jack.***
Jun 10, 2014, 10:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1111]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 1939
Joined: 7/8/99
|
Because he wasn't the best one of the best just not the best***
Jun 9, 2014, 8:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1099]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 2494
Joined: 10/15/13
|
Whitehurst got drafted 3rd round 81st overall
Jun 9, 2014, 9:32 PM
|
|
and its a team game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 9, 2014, 9:43 PM
|
|
Some people don't like to hear it but here goes:
Against a team as talented and well-coached as SC it's hard to sling the ball all over the field. While Tajh had some great games against LSU, OSU, etc, he also had games where he wasn't able to take what the defense gave him when 1) his primary read wasn't available, 2) there wasn't a wide open Sammy/Nuk on a 9 route down the sideline or 3) opposing defenders go physical at the LOS with our WR and threw the timing of the play off.
These weren't always problems for Tajh but they were in the Coot game. Combined with some questionable play calling and the Coots just being able to seal the deal late in the 3rd quarter/early in the 4th quarter (past 3 years), things just didn't work out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6650]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 9722
Joined: 9/22/11
|
And him running directly into the arms of clowney when he
Jun 9, 2014, 9:47 PM
|
|
could of run the other way last year. Him being psyched out by the clown cost us the last 2 games against them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [399]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1132
Joined: 1/25/13
|
Re: And him running directly into the arms of clowney when he
Jun 10, 2014, 1:32 PM
|
|
I wish he would had been patience, felt where the pressure were, stood tall, and kept his eyes scanning down field for what was available at that times. These plays really hurt his draft stock on the big stage games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2273]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2808
Joined: 8/4/05
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 9, 2014, 9:56 PM
[ in reply to Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC? ] |
|
He won some big games but if we had lost the OSU game because of him changing a play when told not to I wonder how people on here would judge him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13359]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9885
Joined: 1/23/06
|
Couldve been ugly
Jun 10, 2014, 11:03 AM
|
|
between that and the late flip pass that was intercepted at the goal line. 2 of the worst INT's of his career.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [295]
TigerPulse: 46%
Posts: 1240
Joined: 6/1/06
|
He played scared , got intimidated
Jun 9, 2014, 9:55 PM
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3389]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3043
Joined: 10/22/07
|
That's a great question---I'm glad you asked. The answer is
Jun 10, 2014, 10:41 AM
|
|
65–42–4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
The real question here
Jun 10, 2014, 10:44 AM
|
|
Why do you have a clemson related handle? Is you're life so sad that you pretend to be a tiger?
I, as a real fan of my team, would never don a coot nickname, even for trolling purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 10:59 AM
|
|
Why do you think you are fooling anyone by being a #### lover on a Clemson website?
Why are you too embarrassed by your ###### school to get a real screen name?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13359]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9885
Joined: 1/23/06
|
TB was NOT the QB in school history
Jun 10, 2014, 10:59 AM
|
|
He is however the QB who saw the most snaps in school history and had an O-coord that liked airing it out. And oh by the way, he was throwing to the best WR corps in school history.
TB is a great person and a good QB, but not the best in school history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16416]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14902
Joined: 1/26/99
|
Why did your Heisman trophy winning RB never score
Jun 10, 2014, 2:12 PM
|
|
Against Clemson?
Why did your best 3 season stretch in school history include zero conference championships and zero national championships?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 2:19 PM
|
|
Oh the mindless nauseating baiting from one our resident Coot trolls!!
Enjoy your little " 5-peat" Cootie bird!!
We STILL OWN YOU !!!
Go Tigers!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 15%
Posts: 30
Joined: 5/27/14
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 3:05 PM
|
|
> I hate when SC fans act like he folded against good
> teams using SC as the only example. They never
> acknowledge his performances against LSU, Ohio St.,
> Georgia, Auburn, etc.
>
> But he sucked against carolina.
I dunno man, it's a legit question that may go unanswered for a long time.
As long as we still got DabDog we'll still be OK though despite our lack of success for so long against Scar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 3:10 PM
|
|
You are a chicken fan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 15%
Posts: 30
Joined: 5/27/14
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 3:23 PM
|
|
> You are a chicken fan.
You have a weird obsession for me, man.
I'm married ......... to a female. Not into that, sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Why did our best QB in school history go 0fer against SC?
Jun 10, 2014, 4:49 PM
|
|
I think this might be one of Stanleys Scoks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [145]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 256
Joined: 7/9/00
|
He didn't. He went 4-0...
Jun 10, 2014, 3:12 PM
|
|
His name is Charlie Whitehurst
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Not the best QB. Not even close
Jun 10, 2014, 4:09 PM
|
|
Woody Dantlzer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [133542]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26343
Joined: 9/18/12
|
He didn't....the team did.***
Jun 10, 2014, 4:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
In a nut shell
Jun 10, 2014, 4:20 PM
|
|
I think Sc got to the point where they just
wanted it more...finally.
They were more physical
Most of the last 6 years our defense was bad to avg.
Plus Tajh had no real running game to support him.
Just my opinion.
#21
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14532]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18193
Joined: 12/16/98
|
Because 1st and 35.***
Jun 10, 2014, 4:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1052]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 1977
Joined: 7/8/13
|
D@mn cuinthemorning
Jun 10, 2014, 5:47 PM
|
|
When I commented last night your pulse was above 70% brah.
What happened lil buddy?
Ps
Don't ####### tell me it's 4:45 at 4:38. IT'S NOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 55
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
