Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 15
| visibility 1

FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015


Aug 28, 2015, 9:17 AM

 
Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When oh when will they finally publish the preseason rankings for


Aug 28, 2015, 9:30 AM

Best thigh pads. I've been waiting all year.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Geville Tiger on Clemson football , "Dabo's only problem is he has to deal with turd fans questioning every move he makes.”


Has anyone let the Tennessee coaching staff know of


Aug 28, 2015, 9:36 AM

this foolishness?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015


Aug 28, 2015, 9:40 AM

Bogus on Baylor.

Their guys were recruited to a scheme and they do it very well, but Baylor basically runs a variation of the Mike Leach offense that features a bunch of small, fast guys zipping around the field. What makes Baylor's guys so effective is not really talent so much as tempo, pace-of-play, and speed of execution. They don't even have a playbook...exactly like Leach, Briles just calls up plays based on what he's seeing on the field and their offense is so bloody simple his guys have repped each play about a gazillion times.

It's a gimmick offense, albeit a highly effective one, and if Briles catches a schematic hole in your D or a mismatch somewhere he's going to beat you over the head with it until you're dead. The problem is, as with a lot of such high-flying gimmick offenses, if it runs into a well-drilled team that has the ponies across the board to match up and has done its homework, it's going to look like a swallow flying into a glass door...thump, and stop. UCF gave them some problems a couple years ago in the Fiesta bowl, and George O'Leary is an implacable old-time throwback coach with a grizzled old defensive staff...and Old School punched Briles' zippy scheme in the mouth that day. The Big 12 doesn't do that much...but then, Big 12 defenses by and large are even worse than Pac-12 defenses, which is saying something.

All of which is to say, their receivers ain't that talented. Just quick, and very polished. But most of them aren't going to be NFL wideouts.

A&M, might - might! - could give Clemson a run for our money. They've recruited some major studs the last few years, and these look like NFL prototypes. Nobody will mistake Kyle Allen for Deshaun Watson, though.

FSU has a fleet of really nice-looking high-end-4 and 5-star wide receivers as well, they're just very young.

Other than that, nobody's really all that close, IMHO.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That's an interesting take


Aug 28, 2015, 10:44 AM

considering KD Cannon and Blake Lynch were both personally offered by Chad Morris and thought to be great fits for our system. Baylor also only has 2 receivers under 6 feet tall (both are 5'11) and 3 guys who are 6'4 or taller so I wouldn't call them zippy or small.

I'd also say their offense is pretty vastly different from Leach's. Baylor runs on around 60% of its plays (Clemson is around 54% and Leach's WSU Cougars run about 38% of the time)

Baylor also has 6 WRs currently on NFL Rosters, and most of them weren't as highly recruited as the guys Baylor currently has.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That's an interesting take


Aug 28, 2015, 10:49 AM

??HOT TAKE??
Seriously though, Baylor's done extremely well when it comes to putting guys in the NFL. They haven't necessarily had a ton of NFL success, but that's not usually an indicator of the best collegiate receivers.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He had a good take till them pesky facts undercut his entire


Aug 28, 2015, 11:46 AM [ in reply to That's an interesting take ]

point

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Who cares about their chances of NFL success??!!


Aug 28, 2015, 11:14 AM [ in reply to Re: FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015 ]

they're really good in college and that's all that matters at this point.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Usually like Athlon but find this hardly accurate


Aug 28, 2015, 10:11 AM

Hard for anyone to matchup clemson depth at WR.... seriously, a 5star frosh as our 6th best WR? what does a&m have to match that?!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Most "analysis" relies more on stats than on potential


Aug 28, 2015, 10:16 AM

That's why I find early season or preseason rankings to be pretty useless.

Let's rank the WRs in November and December. THAT is meaningful.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

two legitimate 1000-yard receivers plus Charone Peake....


Aug 28, 2015, 10:13 AM

nah, I ain't buying that there are two other schools with receivers as accomplished and still with more upside than these guys at Clemson.

that'd be like finding, not one, but 2 White Rhinos in a fish bowl.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Where's Rocky Top??? I thought they were great at


Aug 28, 2015, 10:23 AM

receiver???

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Where's Rocky Top??? I thought they were great at


Aug 28, 2015, 10:33 AM

Sitting waaaaaayyy down at #13, not even worth a short bio. Lucky them lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015


Aug 28, 2015, 10:57 AM

I'm not too familiar with Baylor or TAM but if their WRS are better than the list Clemson has.
I don't want to play either one of those teams.
I have a feeling at the end of this season the Tiger WRS will be clearly #1.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015


Aug 28, 2015, 11:03 AM

They both have great WR units.

It's hard to say which will be better this year until the season plays out, but Clemson is definitely in the top tier.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: Clemson WR's ranked #3 in nation for 2015


Aug 28, 2015, 11:16 AM

Think about the Speed next season with Ray Ray, Scott and Feaster on the field at the same time. DW and all his studs are going to rewrite the record books the next 2 seasons.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 15
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic