Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
crash-and-burn team candidates this year?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 14
| visibility 2,394

crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 3:29 PM

Football doesn't go in a straight line. If it did, the team that signed the best recruits every year would just waltz to the championship. Teams tumble from the top all the time...we're seeing distinct signs with, say, Oklahoma - we put a big nail in that coffin at the end of last year - and we're going to see it with others as well. I think we watched it happen with South Carolina last year too.

Sometimes it's probation. Sometimes it's a coaching change. More often, a team struggles at the most-important spot - QB - and then there just isn't enough around the guy to compensate. A lot of time this coincides with a bunch of off-the-field stuff coming to a head as well.

What happens is, a perennial 10-win team has some bad games, usually towards the end of the year, slides to 8-5, even 7-6. People grumble...but it's not like the team has fallen that far, after all, and the coach has gotten it done in the past so let's stay loyal...but if you take a closer look, you see that the go-getters on the coaching staff are gone and have been replaced with careerist place-holders who are good at collecting paychecks and sounding veteran and knowledgeable but don't actually do much. And somehow, the edge is off the team...and they're just another team again.

So...all that said...who are your picks for the Big Fall this year?

Here's mine....
1) Alabama. They recruit like gangbusters. They also have QB issues, had a bunch of off-the-field issues, and sorry, I just don't see Nick Saban and Lane Kiffin co-existing indefinitely. I don't see them plummeting to the basement but they've looked a lot more ordinary in the past couple seasons...I could see them dropping to the 8-or-9-win level this year, courtesy of the likes of Arkansas, Texas A&M, and especially Auburn, who I think are all better, and have way more mo going their way. You lose your mojo in the SEC West and it gets dicey fast.

2) LSU. Speaking of teams on the tumble, LSU looks poised to drop to maybe even sub-.500. They still recruit like you'd expect a monster-money SEC program to recruit, but their offense was dismal last year even with Leonard Fournette and Les Miles still hasn't got the first clue what he's doing on that side of the ball, and now he's gone and replaced John Chavis with (drum roll)...Kevin Steele. Steele does not handle pressure situations well (to put it mildly), and his PTSD nerves are going to get quite a workout every week in the Wild SEC West. That looks like train-wreck to me. I think this is Les Miles' Last Stand, and I don't think he has enough Forest Gump magic left to survive it.

3) FSU. I don't think this shows up right away. If you look at the Seminole schedule it sets up very nicely for them...early, and I think they'll win - albeit in unimpressive fashion - and coast to a very deceptive 7-1 or even 8-0 early record. Their schedule is squishy-soft, actually, with the only - and I mean only games that should test them being Louisville (at home), Georgia Tech (away), and Clemson (away). But that SEC West-style OOC schedule is...well, an embarassment, and while I think they can sorta stumble and bumble their way to 10 wins with the talent they've got, I think they could well be the worst 10-win team in the country this year. All the ingredients for shipwreck are present - a potential QB problem, off-the-field distractions galore, and poor coaching, especially on the defensive side of the ball. Add to that an overly complicated offense that is not new-QB-friendly, which could be an issue if they're having to switch guys out.

4) Oregon. Mark Helfricht has done a good job keeping things going in Eugene but it's hard to not notice he's no Chip Kelly when it comes to personal leadership or confidence. In fact he looks like a bug under a magnifying glass when you watch him in pre-game interviews or on the sideline, and makes Tommy Bowden's gameday demeanor seem suave in comparison. Helfricht's obviously a bright guy and a Kelly disciple, but inertia only carries you so far...or in this case, it might have carried him only as long as he still had Marcus Mariota. The Ducks did bring in Eastern Washington transfer Vernon Adams, who broke scoreboards at the FCS level, but while Adams is undeniably magic dealing the ball around, he's also small and is no Marcus Mariota running the ball. It also begs the question of what exactly has happened to the Ducks' QB recruiting that they're having to raid the FCS for fifth-year transfers for an emergency starter? The Ducks are also not killers on the defensive side of the ball either. Are they good for eight to ten wins? Probably. Are they a playoff contender in a Pac-12 that features killer offenses that can themselves set scoreboards alight every week? I have doubts. I look at Southern Cal, UCLA, Arizona, Arizona State, or even Stanford as teams that could end Duck Dynasty in emphatic fashion, and I also doubt they've forgotten all the times the Ducks poured it to them in the last decade. I personally think last year's championship loss to Ohio State was probably the high-water mark for the Oregon program, and it's downhill from here. The Pac-12 is such that if you stumble, Oh My, can it get ugly fast.

I'd also count Oklahoma and South Carolina as teams that tumbled last year, and aren't coming back anytime soon.

What say you guys? Who's teetering on the edge of the abyss?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I agree with your 4. Those are mine too. I can't wait to see


Aug 4, 2015, 3:35 PM

the fall of Bama. It's coming.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I agree on 'Bama...


Aug 4, 2015, 3:55 PM

the last 2 years they haven't looked like the world beaters of years before, and have been exposed in back to back bowl games. With the QB issues, Amari Cooper gone and some teams poised to be better in the SECW, I see them dropping at least 2 conference games. 3 is definitely possible. And Wisconsin may beat them to start the season.

Ole Miss- I don't know how they got so hpyed to begin with. Nevermind, because of the ESECPN and the SECW, but Ole Miss is grossly overrated like the past few years and will be lucky to win 8 games this year. They don't have a proven RB or QB. Defense will be good, but back to reality in Oxford...

UCLA- High expectations for UCLA but the PAC 12 South may be the toughest division in college football and their schedule is fairly unforgiving - @ AZ, @ Stanford, @ UT and @ USC with BYU and AZST coming to them. That's a tough go...

Those are my 3 that I thing end up ranked lower than they started, and maybe un-ranked all together.

I think the opposite on OK though. I think they rebound and perform well this season. I think the shellacking that Clemson laid on them was humbling for Stoops and put some pressure on him and the team Trevor Knight, Samaje Perine, and Sterling Shepard are all back. Big 12 is down except for TCU and Baylor and they get TCU in Norman.. an early season win over UT may be what they need to build some confidence and momentum.

Coots continue down the drain though. Best case scenario for them is winning 6 games..

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 4:26 PM

Bama is my pick as well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 4:29 PM

#1. LSU; #2. Iowa; #3. South Carolina and #4. Ole Miss.

Three of the four have real questions where their QBs are concerned. The loss of TEN transfers and a lack of experienced depth is going to be a problem for USC over the length of the season, especially if there are any major injuries. I am sure USC fans would put us in the same situation, but we have much better depth overall.

Go Tigers!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Notre Dame...


Aug 4, 2015, 5:01 PM

always has a group of 4-6 really tough games on the schedule that they could lose, and the ACC has only watered that down slightly.

I'm not sold on Brian Kelly's ability to actually deliver anything beyond the "potential of big things", which he seems to have every year. But where are the results? Yeah, they've made a run or two, but invariably they've gotten waxed at the end of the run in a way that makes it look like they were pretenders all the while.

And I don't see last year growing into anything special this year - the talent hasn't changed that much, and neither has the coaching.

So count me as one who thinks they'll continue to get overhyped, probably win 8-9 each year, and pretty much keep getting toasted anytime they really play someone.

Let us keep recruiting the way we have, Duke continue to bring in talented guys, Petrino get his sea legs under his offense in Louisville, and possibly have to play FSU in Tally or the Bees in Hotlanta every year or so, and the ACC side of the Domers' schedule might end up putting a bigger hurting on them than they bargained for...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Except for LSU, the only place for those teams to go is down


Aug 4, 2015, 5:39 PM

So they might be a little bit too easy of targets, even if Bama and Oregon have put together pretty long strings of elite-level football. FSU really does seem ripe for a let down, but they also had similar problems the year they won the national championship.

Maybe the only other team in the country that recruits like FSU is Alabama, and while I think their defense seems to be taking steps back, they should be pretty strong along the DL. If they can figure out how to rush the passer, they'll be improved. I think they'll be fine with whoever plays QB- most likely to be Jacob Coker- but they also have to replace their top 3 WRs from last year.

I can really see LSU falling to 7 or 8 wins or less. They couldn't pass the ball last year, and while they have some good young talent at WR, there's nobody returning with more than 800 yards receiving. Their leading receiver, Travin Dural, had nearly 500 yards receiving in his first 4 games, but then only went over 50 yards receiving one more time. Malachi Dupre was the #1 WR out of high school but only caught 14 balls last year and had only 1 game where he was really a factor. If Steele's defense doesn't pan out- and I tend to think they'll do better than a lot of people do, considering what Steele did in his first couple of years at Clemson when he had some talent- LSU could look pretty bad.

I don't know that OU will take a total swan dive with Samaje Perine still at RB. There's also the x-factor there of new OC Lincoln Riley.


So my own picks are more along the lines of programs that haven't really built for long term success, but which have been at a high level over the last 3-4 years. South Carolina is definitely one of those, as I think the departure of all that talent on the defensive side of the ball was not replaced with equal talent, and I don't see anybody besides Pharoh Cooper who will scare defenses on the offensive side of the ball. I could see them losing 7 or 8 games this year.

Another pick of mine is Mississippi State. Yes, they'll still have Prescott, but their defense fell apart at the end of last year.

I can also see Ole Miss falling back to earth this year, as they have to break in a new QB (Chad Kelly?). However, they've really recruited well at DL and WR, so they may have a little more staying power.

Stanford seems like the team in the PAC with the best possibility of disappearing. They didn't look particularly good last year, and I don't think they have enough in their program to resist a downward trend. That said... I don't really know a ton about what they have on their team.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

OU could be a surprise contender this year...


Aug 4, 2015, 6:07 PM

Lincoln Riley is the real deal as OC... and they have talent

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Oregon is the obvious pick.


Aug 4, 2015, 6:26 PM

LSU is a possibility - theyve been teetering a bit recently.

I don't think Bama is going anywhere until Saban burns out - just not seeing that one.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 6:29 PM

Bama will go 10-2 this season but yea that's a bad year for them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

i vote UGA


Aug 4, 2015, 8:48 PM

Will start 4-0 and move into top 5. Bama comes to town and will beat them. They will then go on the road and lose to UT. With the season pretty much lost at this point and Bowden2.0 on the sidelines a flat UGA loses to Missouri at home to complete the meltdown. Losses at Auburn and GT to finish off the season and the Dawgs are heading to Shreveport.

I know they have Chubb, but no QB and no playmakers on the outside will not work. I'm not sold on their defense either. I thinks Dobbs, Maulk and Thomas will light them up.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LSU. 70 Reasons why. Real head-scratcher.....***


Aug 4, 2015, 9:31 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 9:40 PM

Baylor and or TCU. I see 10 regular season wins or less for both.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 9:57 PM

NC State. They're getting a lot of hype, based on a solid year from Jacoby Brissett last year, but that team wasn't in the same league as a good but not great Clemson team. Brissett looked like a high schooler against our secondary's coverage ability and they couldn't run the ball worth a darn. Their secondary got toasted repeatedly as well. I think they'll have an ok year record-wise with their terribly weak schedule, but they'll lose every game that matters.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: crash-and-burn team candidates this year?


Aug 4, 2015, 11:34 PM

1) Oregon did not have an outstanding QB recruiting class year after year. They got all their QBs from Hawaii. They high school teams play that wide open offense like Oregon played with Chip Kelly and now with Mark Helfritch. But their defense has always been their weak link, hence why they have to score 40-50 points a game. The other teams would likely score 30-40 points a game.

2) I would never count out LSU or Alabama because contrary to popular belief, the SEC West isn't all that dominant. If you are going to pick the two teams out of the SEC West that will propel backwards, go to the great state of Mississippi. Ole Miss will be breaking in "Mad Chad" at QB. They recruited really well that one year and has yet to produce consistency. I will add another team that everyone is clambering about but may only win 8-9 games. That team is A&M. Speedy Noll is an amazing talent. That defense gives up so many points. And like Oregon, they have to score a lot to stay ahead.

3) I like the FSU pick and here is why...While they have talent, their defense isn't coached all that well and will have four new starters on the offensive line. Everyone thinks Everett Golson is going to be starting by the time they play Georgia Tech and I don't believe that is going to be the case. I will disagree with one take. I think the Noles only win 9 games. I am not sold on Sean Maguire as the QB that will be as good as Winston was. He will not have the luxury of Rashad Greene to throw to, and his line will not protect him that well, which means he will force it into windows that are not there.

4) I will add one more team on this list and its Michigan State. Now, many will say they should be fine with their defensive guru leaving the ranks to coach at Pitt. I will say that is false. I think their defense will struggle and because their offense will not be able to suffice for this, they will win between 7-9 games.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 14
| visibility 2,394
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic