|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1
|
Legend [18250]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7006
Joined: 10/15/21
|
|
|
|
 |
Commissioner [923]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 2101
Joined: 12/30/19
|
I like going by the average Star rating, not points... but
Feb 3, 2022, 10:47 AM
|
|
still a decent class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24159]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 16409
Joined: 8/6/02
|
Tell 'em u7c coot. No one knows losing better than you.
Feb 3, 2022, 1:29 PM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64888]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33144
Joined: 12/3/03
|
Not according to ESECPN. They had the TarHoles at #10,
Feb 3, 2022, 11:01 AM
|
|
and us at #15 last night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [37418]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9282
Joined: 6/13/19
|
Re: Not according to ESECPN. They had the TarHoles at #10,
Feb 3, 2022, 11:07 AM
|
|
247 - 11th
Rivals - 10th
ESPN - 14th
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [37418]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9282
Joined: 6/13/19
|
Re: Guess the 4th straight number one ACC class means we’re finished ?????
Feb 3, 2022, 11:03 AM
|
|
It would have been nice to get another cornerback, but other than that, I'm happy with the '22 class.
Go Tigers!!! Let's win the ACC again!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15730]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 17364
Joined: 2/1/99
|
Looking at Rivals overall class rankings through the years:
Feb 3, 2022, 11:17 AM
|
|
Year Rk
2010 19
2011 8
2012 14
2013 14
2014 13
2015 4
2016 6
2017 22
2018 8
2019 9
2020 2
2021 7
2022 10
Even if we just look at it from the point where we started hitting on all cylinders (2015 recruiting according to the above), 10 is hardly a huge outlier. When you consider that we lost our DC, our OC, and some assistants, I'd say it's pretty darned solid and consistent with our normal performance. The big difference is the decommits we had after losing coaches, which led to us having to recruit into the February signing day, which hasn't been our MO in recent years.
All good stuff, I'd say.
Surprised NCSU and Pitt are so low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6972]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6347
Joined: 9/21/04
|
Re: Looking at Rivals overall class rankings through the years:
Feb 3, 2022, 8:45 PM
|
|
Our average over the last 10 years is finishing at 9.5. Looks like we’re right on target
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6972]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6347
Joined: 9/21/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2634]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2125
Joined: 10/29/99
|
Clemson-UNC 1a-1b
Feb 3, 2022, 1:43 PM
|
|
Essentially we tied UNC for the best class... good arguments for which one is better that go both ways.
FSU a clear 3rd. Miami pretty clear 4th.
Virginia, Syracuse, and Wake at the bottom.
5-11 is pretty much a crapshoot... Pitt is low on the list only because its such as small class. Vtech is high on the list just because its such a large class.
One could easily argue that NC State, Pitt, and Georgia Tech had better classes than Vtech and BC.
Overall talent rankings for entire teams:
1) Clemson still way out front
2) FSU/UNC - UNC may be passing FSU for 2nd
4) Miami
5) Pitt/NC State/Louisville/VTech/Virginia/BC
11) Duke/GA Tech
13) Wake/Syracuse
Big Overachievers: Wake/Duke/Pitt
Big Underachievers: FSU/UNC/Miami
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2273]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2808
Joined: 8/4/05
|
Re: Clemson-UNC 1a-1b
Feb 4, 2022, 11:44 PM
|
|
According to averages we did not out recruit the tar holes but still we have a pretty good class considering where we were a month ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1417]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 1618
Joined: 11/21/00
|
Shouldn’t our sights be set higher than just the ACC
Feb 3, 2022, 10:28 PM
|
|
I thought we were an elite, nationally relevant program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10898]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12985
Joined: 8/4/14
|
We are #10 nationally, after losing our DC & OC...
Feb 4, 2022, 10:57 PM
|
|
you shouldn't be complaining about that!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3134]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2974
Joined: 11/11/02
|
Too bad UNC. LOL Wulfpups. So sorry Wake. Yikes Pitt.***
Feb 3, 2022, 10:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
