»
Topic: Chinese book foreshadows COVID
Replies: 10   Last Post: May 10, 2021, 10:22 AM by: quozzel
[ General Boards - Politics & Religion ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 10  

Chinese book foreshadows COVID

[3]
Posted: May 10, 2021, 7:52 AM
    Reply

Hmm, missed this on MSM and waiting on Lebron to weigh in before making any conclusions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuKPBur_TiI

link

TBalm already figured out the "delivery system"


Posted: May 10, 2021, 8:28 AM
    Reply

Started discussing this a couple days ago on his thread about "space junk"....

"I just wonder what kind of new virus it will be dispersing into the atmosphere on the way down???"

link

It's the cure. Airborne HCQ.***

[1]
Posted: May 10, 2021, 8:43 AM
    Reply



2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg link

Re: Chinese book foreshadows COVID

[1]
Posted: May 10, 2021, 8:38 AM
    Reply

Sky News is Mainstream Media, you dipsh!t.

I literally watched that last night myself. Your incessant grating that everybody not on your side is evil is getting old.

link


To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's

[1]
Posted: May 10, 2021, 9:42 AM
    Reply

ever posted.

Way I see it, it's an admission by China by way of omission. It took the world all of what, two months, if that, to trace swine flu in 2009 to two pig farms in Veracruz, Mexico. They found the original pigs who got the virus, tested the pigs, and confirmed the first human transmission happened on those pig farms and that virus jumped from pigs to humans right there.

The wet market BS really gave it away. They closed it, sent everyone home, INCLUDING the animals. None were tested? ### kind of dumbassery is that? They then went in and tested surfaces in the place and found the virus, then concluded it started there. Yet they DID NOT TEST THE FREAKING ANIMALS when it would have been easiest to find the host. But that really wasn't the biggest red flag. The Lancet released a study a few months into the outbreak and it traced the earliest cases of the virus back to December 1st. The first 3-4 people who contracted covid in China, in EARLY December 2019, had NO CONTACT with the market in Wuhan. Then China later concluded, after that study was released, it didn't start in the freaking market.

Nope, case 1 was likely a worker at some lab, or was associated with some lab. They probably quarantined their whole family and everyone they came in contact with. Then waited, and someone else popped up with it. They probably locked them away as well, and their families. Then it spread to another person, and another, all the while they're keeping them quarantined. This could have gone on for months. But when it hit that market, that was the first "super spreader" event, and the cat was out of the bag then.

Just my guess. Still a guess, but China has done nothing to disprove a lab leak theory, at all. Probably because they can't. Their original lie was a lie, and that's about all we know. Don't really need to know any more. They had already leaked SARS once, messing around with it in a lab. They managed to contain that outbreak to like 20 people. China also knew early on a lot about the virus. more than could be known as quickly as they published studies. Things the CDC has only now confirmed through independent studies. Nope, this had been a known virus for a while, and China had been studying it for a while before Wuhan happened. Trump was briefed around Thanksgiving of 2019 about a new virus emerging in China during one of the many daily intelligence briefings he ignored. Blood samples from Italy had covid antibodies in September of 2019. Here in the US we identified antibodies in Red Cross blood samples from early December 2019 in nine states. And of those positives, only 3% reported traveling within 28 days of the blood sample being taken, meaning they acquired the virus locally in the US a month before probably in November. So much behavior similar to influenza. Worse, but the way the virus acts, spreads, and evolves is very similar.

And Sars is a VERY poor candidate among viruses to even attempt to "weaponize".

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg link

Re: To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's


Posted: May 10, 2021, 9:50 AM
    Reply

Yeah. I noticed even Avril Haines almost casually mentioned that lab in one of her first briefings and she's as sharp a cookie as there is. That turned my head around; she's completely apolitical. Whatever, a of people are clearly looking at that lab in Wuhan.

Nobody wanted to agree with Trump on anything because he was, well, Trump, and he just tended to shoot off at the mouth random bits of rapidfire word salad and never produce a bit of supportive evidence of anything to back up anything he said, but increasingly, that Wuhan lab theory his state department guys were floating back in 2018 looks like they might have been right about.

link


Re: To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's


Posted: May 10, 2021, 9:59 AM
    Reply

Hey that’s a good reason not to believe something...because Trump said it. I remember others on here including myself were saying it was the lab, this time a year ago. I remember Deweather posting some article from Nature saying that couldn’t be true. That was it. The “science” had spoken. Too bad the common sense hadn’t.

Let’s see...a lab experimenting in gain of function by coronaviruses and using bats. They had had security incidents before back in 2018. Immediately as soon as this incident happened, all of the scientists involved in the lab either “died” or disappeared and haven’t been heard from since. Oh and one of the original American scientists who said it couldn’t have come from the lab later admitted he was just covering for Chinese scientists.

Yep nothing to see here. Oh and the WHO cleared them after their guided tour. So that settles it.

BTW Trump has been correct about everything that he said would happen under Biden as well.

2021 orange level member link

Re: To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's


Posted: May 10, 2021, 10:06 AM
    Reply

Trump said a lot of really crazy and unhinged stuff, and that really affected his credibility. So much bullsh!t flew out of his mouth, I think people just reflexively assumed everything that came out of his mouth was bullsh!t. Truthfully I'm not sure even he could tell the difference because his stories tended to change hour-by-hour or tweet-by-tweet even in the course of a single day.

That said, yup, Team Trump might have been right about the lab, and the WHO might have dusted it under the rug for political expedience...and the world might have to re-visit that discussion whether they want to have it or not. Especially because the effing Chinese are trying to now put that on us. You know their propagandists are now trying to claim COVID came from an American bio-warfare lab, and they're spreading that lie aggressively?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whJwOkeBV5c

link


Re: To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's


Posted: May 10, 2021, 10:22 AM
    Reply

I have a feeling we will end up in a military conflict with China within the next 5 years. They are doing stupid things at a record pace right now and they sense an opportunity. They will make a major mistake by invading Taiwan or otherwise cause harm to US interests and we will have no choice but to respond. The key factor will be if Russia (and maybe Iran) decides to join with them. I could see Russia doing that but I don’t think China would if the shoe was on the other foot say with us defending Ukraine. It would be interesting to see which of our NATO “allies” are really allies when things got bad for us. I suspect that’s just a one way street.

2021 orange level member link

It is possible to believe it's a lab leak, and Trump was

[1]
Posted: May 10, 2021, 10:14 AM
    Reply

right about that, and still think Trump's a populist/narcissist/opportunist.

Just tossing that out there.

I've always held the possibility and probability it was a leak from a lab. Now I never went full bioweapon because that's not a likely scenario. But a accidental lab leak is absolutely possible, if not probable. And if it wasn't a lab leak, there's a LOT China could have done to refute that theory, and they haven't. Which is why it's probable in my book. Could be they were trying to study SARS to figure out what mutations could make it a pandemic, ostensibly to prevent one. And they found it. Doesn't have to be weapons-related. And it leaked. We are doing this with Ebola right now as well. What mutations could make Ebola more transmissible? Why did many outbreaks not spread in Africa, but then that one a few years ago did? There's legit scientific value in studying this, but it's playing with fire and probably should NOT be done anywhere, much less in a place with just enough knowledge to be dangerous, and not enough wisdom to leave SARS the #### alone.

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg link

Re: It is possible to believe it's a lab leak, and Trump was


Posted: May 10, 2021, 10:22 AM
    Reply

Well, the bug wasn't weaponized, virologists confirmed that. So if it got out it was probably leaked. There was a ton of alarm among the State department guys who visited that lab about the procedures and staff there; they thought they were in over their heads.

Everything points to the fact that they had themselves a Chernobyl, and covered it up. And it got all over us.

link


Replies: 10  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 4 Great seats ON THE AISLE, Section H Row LL, 8 steps from the tunnel, great seats on the 20 yd line...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ General Boards - Politics & Religion ]
Start New Topic
285 people have read this post