Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 52
| visibility 1

Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 7, 2013, 2:39 PM

David Pollack tweets about Clemson

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 7, 2013, 2:41 PM

I think we could play with Stanford, I mean they lost to Utah.... but he is correct. Stanford would put a lot of pressure on the OL.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

BULLETIN BOARD MOTIVATION FOR TIGERS O-LINE


Nov 7, 2013, 5:23 PM

This should #### off every offensive lineman at Clemson starter or not. When you get tired think about proving Pollack wrong.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I would like to agree but at this stage of the season....it


Nov 8, 2013, 6:23 AM

is what it is....unfortunately.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 8, 2013, 4:41 PM [ in reply to Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson ]

I tweeted him back, Or Clemson over UGA bulldogs.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Clemson 38- UGA 35***


Nov 7, 2013, 2:42 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My thoughts exactly pard.***


Nov 7, 2013, 8:37 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah and #### your GA bulldogs!***


Nov 7, 2013, 2:42 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He went to UGA, but Clemson is #2 for David.


Nov 7, 2013, 3:30 PM

(He almost committed to us). He speaks the truth here. Stanford's DL > our OL.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: He went to UGA, but Clemson is #2 for David.


Nov 7, 2013, 4:08 PM

Maybe so, maybe no, but we still don't like hearing it. We sometimes can't handle the truth too well. Especially me.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: He went to UGA, but Clemson is #2 for David.


Nov 7, 2013, 6:55 PM

have you been watching the train wreck at lg and rt this year?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Hear way worse on here. He has always had good things


Nov 7, 2013, 8:41 PM [ in reply to Re: He went to UGA, but Clemson is #2 for David. ]

to say about Clemson. Believe that both his parents graduated from Clemson.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Hear way worse on here. He has always had good things


Nov 8, 2013, 6:11 PM

He should have too. It would have made an even better man out of him.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

wrong


Nov 7, 2013, 2:42 PM

IMO Stanford might be the most overrated in the top 10 this season

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Nah - I think Ohio State would get spanked by Stanford***


Nov 7, 2013, 2:44 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Looks like Pollack was right.***


Nov 8, 2013, 10:56 AM [ in reply to wrong ]



badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Oregon says hi.


Nov 8, 2013, 5:38 PM [ in reply to wrong ]

So does Baylor.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Apparently SEC homers only apply deer antler spray down.


Nov 7, 2013, 2:43 PM

Not too many that are strong from the neck up.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Apparently SEC homers only apply deer antler spray down.


Nov 7, 2013, 4:09 PM

That is one thing they have in common. TU!!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why does Tnet post this kind of stuff?


Nov 7, 2013, 2:44 PM

Pollack saying our O-Line would have a miserable time against Stanford? Nomatter what happens, we have almost no chance of playing them in a bowl anyway, so I'm not even sure why he throws us into that equation. Just a reason to slander Clemson, I guess?

"Man, could you imagine if the Denver Broncos played... let's see.. if they played Clemson?? haha - man that would be a beating."

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Probably same reason Mod's announce players


Nov 7, 2013, 3:02 PM

committing to other schools.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Because posts like this are some of the most popular


Nov 8, 2013, 6:55 AM [ in reply to Why does Tnet post this kind of stuff? ]

threads on Tigernet. Just look at the number of responses. Post something anti Clemson or something about Spurrier, and you are guaranteed 50+ responses.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Pollack isn't the usual SEC homer


Nov 7, 2013, 2:49 PM

who just dogs us out. He did pick us over FSU right? No idea why this question is posed to begin with but he's likely right. Our powder puff O Line would crumble against their DL. They may be over rated but that doesn't change the fact that our OL, besides tuff Ga game, has been hot garbage for the most part. Against bad competition at that

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He's comparing best wins between FSU & Oregon.***


Nov 7, 2013, 2:50 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


Re: He's comparing best wins between FSU & Oregon.***


Nov 7, 2013, 3:52 PM

Yea, but he was considering Clemson vs Stanford in a head to head matchup in order to decide which is more impressive.

I'm not sure we would lose to Stanford, but we'd have to come up with a great gameplan because he's right, their DL would demolish our line.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

tell em coot***


Nov 7, 2013, 7:17 PM [ in reply to Pollack isn't the usual SEC homer ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I smell chicken***


Nov 8, 2013, 5:39 PM [ in reply to Pollack isn't the usual SEC homer ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Deer Mange


Nov 7, 2013, 2:50 PM

he's 100% correct

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ryan Norton is terrible!!!


Nov 7, 2013, 2:50 PM

Jay went in midway through the 2nd quarter and played really good. Ryan is too slow.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Note for future reference....


Nov 7, 2013, 3:23 PM

never recruit players from a high school that is a perennial doormat. Ryan Norton is a good kid but he played for a terrible school (Mauldin High School) and an even worse coach. Any good coaching he received he got after arriving at Clemson.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Ryan Norton has not been a problem at all this year***


Nov 7, 2013, 4:03 PM [ in reply to Ryan Norton is terrible!!! ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why is anyone offended by this?


Nov 7, 2013, 2:56 PM

Anyone have proof otherwise?

FYI: Stanford has a very good defense, especially their front 7. Our O-line has not played great. We'd have a ton of trouble against them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Exactly.....it's clear Stanford's DL is much better


Nov 7, 2013, 3:32 PM

than our OL.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Exactly.....it's clear Stanford's DL is much better


Nov 8, 2013, 4:55 PM

Not a word said about Stanfarts DL all year before they played Oregon. Now that they beat Oregon, it's being said that Stanfart has a 70's steel curtain D.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


B/c anything remotely accurate or objective that doesn't fit


Nov 7, 2013, 4:00 PM [ in reply to Why is anyone offended by this? ]

the tnet pumper mentality is deemed negative and the poster a coot.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Were you making jokes? Nothing in anything he said


Nov 7, 2013, 10:29 PM

was necessarily accurate or objective. It was nothing but subjective opinion. But then again, your record here already shows you know nothing about accuracy or objectivity.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What's the point of even mentioning the UGA game here?


Nov 7, 2013, 3:13 PM

Pollack didn't say a word about Georgia. The fact that we beat his school has absolutely no bearing on this at all. The guy is just doing his job and giving his opinions, and IMO he's one of the better talking heads at ESPN.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 7, 2013, 3:14 PM

How did that same prediction about LSU last year work out for you?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Does nobody remember Stanford losing to Utah?


Nov 7, 2013, 4:02 PM

Yeah, they lost to a 4-4 Utah team and are Utah's only conference win so far. They also gave up more than 400 yards while only sacking the Utah QB once.

Oh yeah, they beat Washington by 3 because of some questionable calls, and they were outgained 489 to 279.

Then there was the game where they were only one score ahead of Army at the half.


I know Clemson has looked suspect in a couple of games, but I don't know why Stanford is even in the top 10 other than their being in the top 5 in the pre- season.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Does nobody remember Stanford losing to Utah?


Nov 7, 2013, 7:45 PM

UTAH is in the Pac-12?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 7, 2013, 4:07 PM

He thought we would lose to ugay and to LSU, also. I like Pollock, but he is an SEcheat homer. Don't lose sight of that.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Just like we wanted "no part of L$U" right Pollack?!? KMA!***


Nov 7, 2013, 6:43 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So Stanford's dominant DL shouldn't lose to Oregon OL


Nov 7, 2013, 7:14 PM

wait...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 7, 2013, 7:56 PM

Give it a break, David Pollack could not have been more pro Clemson earlier in the year.

That is the way it goes, have folks on the bandwagon, lose at home big and they jump ship quickly

Ask Clowney how long they stayed with him

Ask Boise how long they stayed with them?

They are just waiting for Baylor to lose one so they can drop them off the face of the earth as well.

think Oregon every year...they pump them up then they lose one and they are relegated to 10 second blips of a few highlights and right on to whoever is winning

Very fickle media in all sports Win or go home is about all they are

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I love how everyone hates DP now


Nov 7, 2013, 8:00 PM

Don't have a problem with anything he said and usually don't.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


DP ?


Nov 7, 2013, 8:08 PM

Hahahaha!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

sadly he is right..


Nov 7, 2013, 8:23 PM

our o line is soft.stanfords d line would have a field day. dont see why david gets so much hate on here.the dude calls it fairly.he loved clemson until we crapped the bed at fsu and proved him wrong.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: sadly he is right..


Nov 8, 2013, 5:08 PM

98% of all college teams have a bad game. Clemson has been winning the games we are suppose to win. I mean THE sec Bama lost to the coots when nobody in the world even come close to picking that loss, not even Spurrier.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 7, 2013, 10:33 PM

I like Pollack. Doesn't seem to have an agenda. Calling it like he sees it. In this case, I happen to agree with him. One of the best announcers out there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Update: David Pollack tweets about Clemson


Nov 8, 2013, 8:34 AM

After Watching Stanford beat down Oregon last night I would have to agree with Pollack.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Suck it Polluck!!! We whooped Ga's ####!!


Nov 8, 2013, 10:58 AM

tired of hearing about Stanford and their 1 dimensional 1948 offense! Oregon is TINY on Defense. Our D matches up with their OL much better so it might not be a fun night for their OL either!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah! Worry about your beaten down dawgs!


Nov 8, 2013, 11:01 AM

nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That Guy Tweet's About His Day's at The Athen's Glory Hole


Nov 8, 2013, 5:12 PM

When he felatiated more deviants than one can count.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 52
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic