Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
"Clemsoning" is back on the board, the Washington post wrote a whole article about it
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 1,209

"Clemsoning" is back on the board, the Washington post wrote a whole article about it


Sep 21, 2014, 1:36 PM

Good job Dabo

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Clemsoning" is back on the board, the Washington post wrote a whole article about it


Sep 21, 2014, 1:37 PM

Link?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

W3Clem1 is back on the boards, he wrote a whole post about


Sep 21, 2014, 1:37 PM

it. Good job Dabo

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh we must have lost to a team we were supposed to beat and were favored against in Death Valley.


Sep 21, 2014, 1:38 PM

The real story here is how the cameras that should have been on Clemson's sideline zoomed to Crime Time every time he squeezed out a fart.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Clemsoning" is a moving target for whoever wants to


Sep 21, 2014, 1:56 PM

put us down.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That writer will lose his job soon


Sep 21, 2014, 1:38 PM

Look at his articles. He's writing smut.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Clemsoning" is back on the board, the Washington post wrote a whole article about it


Sep 21, 2014, 1:39 PM

Now, there's something to be proud of! Adding new words to the language, how nice.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Boy that definition has expanded


Sep 21, 2014, 1:39 PM

If it now includes losing in overtime, on the road, to the #1 team in the country. I thought "CLEMSONING" was conditioned on inferior opponents.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You are completely right.


Sep 21, 2014, 1:44 PM

It's almost like we are held to a higher standard than anyone else bc of past transgressions. Every team loses games, every team has turnovers, every team plays bad at times.

And because we have beaten the term Clemsoning by not losing to an inferior (a team we were favored to beat) in years. The media is now trying to adjust the term to mean losing any time! Or making a bad play, anytime!

It's college football. No team is perfect! And only one team a year usually goes undefeated.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


really. I guess they are just going to exand it to mean


Sep 21, 2014, 2:16 PM [ in reply to Boy that definition has expanded ]

losing a game period. I guess any time we lose it will be that if you lose in an upset it is and if you lose to a team that was ranked number 1 and still favored by double digits at kickoff. That pretty much covers any type of loss. It is amazing that we can be continuously put down and made a double digit underdog, yet the world is still shocked when we lose.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Been at least three years that we lost a game we were


Sep 21, 2014, 2:13 PM

supposed to win and last night wasn't one. Also, been a very long time since we lost a game in heartbreaking style due to crazy player errors. Every team in the country has lost one like that since we have.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: "Clemsoning" is back on the board, the Washington post wrote a whole article about it


Sep 21, 2014, 2:18 PM

F**k the Washington post!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 11
| visibility 1,209
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic