|
Replies: 70
| visibility 1
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
After FSu beats Miami, they better jump Oregon.
Oct 31, 2013, 9:18 AM
|
|
Agreed?
|
|
|
|
 |
Aficionado [178]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 305
Joined: 2/13/02
|
Re: After FSu beats Miami, they better jump Oregon.
Oct 31, 2013, 9:23 AM
|
|
They will, and then Oregon will jump FSU when they beat Stanford next Thursday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
The pollsters are ####-bent on a Oregon-Bama NC.
Oct 31, 2013, 9:25 AM
|
|
I bet it doesn't happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [51]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 150
Joined: 8/21/13
|
I have said all year those are the two best teams
Oct 31, 2013, 9:34 AM
|
|
But now FSU is making me wonder...too bad there isn't a playoff this year.
Oregon 59 Tennessee 14
Bama 45 Tennessee 10
Very similar, would be a very good match-up between Bama and Oregon. We will see how FSU does the rest of the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2519]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3326
Joined: 8/23/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Oregon will play Bama for the MNC if they both stay
Oct 31, 2013, 9:25 AM
|
|
undefeated. It's the match up the media has wanted for years, and therefore they will make it happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Which media members will make it happen?***
Oct 31, 2013, 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Are you implying that the media doesn't influence
Oct 31, 2013, 1:30 PM
|
|
any of the polls that make up the BCS rankings?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
He was basically calling you a moran. Go Tigers!***
Oct 31, 2013, 1:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10354]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14025
Joined: 11/9/04
|
bama has the least attractive resume thus far...of the 3
Oct 31, 2013, 9:27 AM
|
|
crazy how they're the "automatic #1" no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [218]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 334
Joined: 1/9/07
|
A wise man once said:
Oct 31, 2013, 9:31 AM
|
|
TO BE THE MAN - YOU GOT TO BEAT THE MAN!!!
WOOOOOOO!!! WOOOOOOOO!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1746]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4362
Joined: 11/4/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: There really isnt a reason for them not to be #1.***
Oct 31, 2013, 9:47 AM
|
|
There's plenty of reason, they haven't beaten anyone and they play a crappy schedule....their opponents are a combined 29-34 as opposed to 32-21 for FSU. that will go up even more after this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1746]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4362
Joined: 11/4/01
|
I still believe Bama will beat whoever they play...
Oct 31, 2013, 2:11 PM
|
|
the rest of the year. They havent played anyone but they've hammered everyone. FSU has essentially done the same (Oregon too I guess), but its hard to bet against that tea mand Nick Saban with that month off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10354]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14025
Joined: 11/9/04
|
based off history you're correct, but THIS year.........
Oct 31, 2013, 9:55 AM
[ in reply to There really isnt a reason for them not to be #1.*** ] |
|
why is FSU & Oregon fighting for #2 when after saturday will both have a better resume than bama................that being said after LSU and auburn and the SECCG they'd have an argument, but as of now they don't
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
I wouldn't put too much stock into this year's SECCG.
Oct 31, 2013, 9:59 AM
|
|
Because whomever wins the East sucks anyway. There's a reason SCAR still has a shot of winning it. If UGA would've stayed healthy, they would be the clear-cut favorites to win it and would actually give Bama a good game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10354]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14025
Joined: 11/9/04
|
the SEC east winner will be top 15, possibly top 10......
Oct 31, 2013, 10:03 AM
|
|
and i don't think alabama is an "impossible" team to beat this year
the East winner will give them a game
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
I agree with the statement about Bama, but they would win
Oct 31, 2013, 10:07 AM
|
|
by double-digits over a SCAR, Florida or Mizzou, imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10354]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14025
Joined: 5/21/08
|
not even considering UF they can't score against grass***
Oct 31, 2013, 9:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
Agreed. The East sucks!***
Oct 31, 2013, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
not necessarily...
Oct 31, 2013, 12:27 PM
[ in reply to the SEC east winner will be top 15, possibly top 10...... ] |
|
Let's say South Carolina wins their conference games but loses to Clemson. They'd have 3 losses, and they'd be out of the top 15, but they'd be in the SECC. The only way UGa gets into the SECC is winning out, and in that case, I think they'd be in the top 15 with consecutive wins over UF, Auburn and GT. Missouri could lose to A&M and still get into the SECC, but they'd probably be right on the cusp of the top 15 because A&M is their last game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14921]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12314
Joined: 3/28/06
|
I heard a guy on Bill King's XM show earlier this week say
Oct 31, 2013, 11:07 AM
[ in reply to bama has the least attractive resume thus far...of the 3 ] |
|
(I can't remember who the guest was) "Bama is still my number 1. They haven't done anything to lose their ranking yet."
That's indicative of why college football is broken (and may not be fixed until we get a legit 8-team playoff)--your ranking shouldn't be based on "not doing anything to lose a spot" but what you've done to EARN that spot this year.
I think FSU and Oregon are the only two teams who've done anything to earn a one or two spot this year and sadly one of them will be left out because Bama is Bama and hasn't "lost" their spot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 10336
Joined: 9/11/08
|
Re: I heard a guy on Bill King's XM show earlier this week say
Oct 31, 2013, 11:13 AM
|
|
very well said. sure agree...that spot should EARNED but with the mentality that SEC gets everything that poor judgement will continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
Yep, unfortunate that they can't be unseated
Oct 31, 2013, 12:23 PM
[ in reply to bama has the least attractive resume thus far...of the 3 ] |
|
But the voters just aren't going to move them until they lose. FSU and Oregon look like the better teams thus far this year, and I would rather see them play than Oregon and Alabama.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
No.***
Oct 31, 2013, 9:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
Why? Explain yourself....***
Oct 31, 2013, 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I don't know which team is better...
Oct 31, 2013, 9:41 AM
|
|
(I lean toward Oregon), but I think it's close enough so that I wouldn't say "they better jump Oregon".
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26322]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14238
Joined: 2/5/08
|
I say that because Oregon jumped FSU after they BOTH
Oct 31, 2013, 9:44 AM
|
|
won. So, beating a top team justifies them jumping Oregon, imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I don't think it would be wrong if they did jump Oregon
Oct 31, 2013, 9:45 AM
|
|
But I also don't think it would be wrong if they didn't. It doesn't really matter...if they both go undefeated, Oregon's resume will pass that of FSU, because of the ACC's lack of depth. If Alabama loses a game, it definitely won't matter, cause they'll play each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: I don't think it would be wrong if they did jump Oregon
Oct 31, 2013, 9:48 AM
|
|
FSU will have beaten Clemson, Miami, Florida, Miami....who will Oregon have beaten? Stanford and UCLA? That's it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Arizona, Washington, Oregon St., Utah
Oct 31, 2013, 9:50 AM
|
|
The 4th best team on FSU's schedule (Pitt? Maryland?) would be the 7th or 8th best team on Oregon's schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: Arizona, Washington, Oregon St., Utah
Oct 31, 2013, 10:02 AM
|
|
Arizona, washington and utah? You can't be serious. Or. St. lost to a dang FCS team....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
Washington's good, Utah and Arizona not so much***
Oct 31, 2013, 12:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
#16 Washington. But I agree with you...
Oct 31, 2013, 9:54 AM
[ in reply to Re: I don't think it would be wrong if they did jump Oregon ] |
|
FSU wins - #3 #7 #25
Oregon wins - #5 #12 #16
And Oregons #5 win being to a won loss Stanford.
FSU all three wins were undefeated...
Really don't get the reason or math behind it. And people talk about media preference? They're waiting for FSU to slip up... But it the don't, are you kidding me? Historical kings of the ACC and SEC matched up for the NC? Two eras of dynasty football collide? How do you pass that up....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
You know each team will have more than 3 wins, right?
Oct 31, 2013, 9:58 AM
|
|
Each will have 12. Why are you only talking about three wins for each team? What about the other 9?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Yea #######, but as of today they're he only 3 ranked
Oct 31, 2013, 10:02 AM
|
|
We have to go on... Not to mention the wins over non ranked opps were blowouts on both sides...
Sorry, but the computers don't have a category for "coot perceived strength of schedule"
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
So you think only games against ranked teams should
Oct 31, 2013, 10:03 AM
|
|
count?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
I think it's a wash with no ranked opps
Oct 31, 2013, 10:12 AM
|
|
Because they all got blown out.
And of the 3 UNDEFEATED ranked teams FSU shutout out 1 and had a larger margin of victory on both. The next two weeks will tell us a lot.
Oregon will have to beat the brakes off 1 loss Stanford and FSU will have to struggle with Miami. I don't see either of those happening. FSU jumps and stays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Are you joking?
Oct 31, 2013, 9:56 AM
|
|
The PAC-12 is arguably deeper than even the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
You obviously think more of....
Oct 31, 2013, 10:00 AM
|
|
teams like Oregon State, Washington, Southern Cal and Arizona than I do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: You obviously think more of....
Oct 31, 2013, 10:03 AM
|
|
Prod is pretty delusional. He thinks Utah, Washington and Arizona are actually good...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: Just about every measure has the PAC-12 above the ACC
Oct 31, 2013, 10:36 AM
|
|
but based on what exactly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Mainly, wins and losses.
Oct 31, 2013, 10:59 AM
|
|
Check the OOC records. PAC-12 is 30-6 (21-5 vs. FBS)...ACC is 34-11 (21-11 vs. FBS). The ACC's OOC record vs. FBS schools lags behind all the other major conferences (PAC-12, SEC, Big 12, and Big Ten). The ACC has played a tougher OOC slate overall than the others, but they had some bad losses in there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: Mainly, wins and losses.
Oct 31, 2013, 12:04 PM
|
|
and had some good wins...whats the record vs SEC? for each?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
ACC is 2-2 vs. SEC, PAC-12 is 1-1.
Oct 31, 2013, 12:11 PM
|
|
It should be noted that the ACC lost both head-to-head matchups with the PAC-12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Best team vs. one of the worst teams yes...***
Oct 31, 2013, 12:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Who is the sixth best team in the ACC?
Oct 31, 2013, 10:02 AM
[ in reply to Are you joking? ] |
|
Pitt? By comparison, the PAC-12's sixth best team is either Washington, Oregon St. or Arizona.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Actually it's duke
Oct 31, 2013, 10:08 AM
|
|
ACC has more teams in the top 6 with 3+ conferences wins than the PAC 12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Conference wins aren't really a good measure...
Oct 31, 2013, 10:52 AM
|
|
To compare conferences, we should be looking at out-of-conference games. The PAC-12 dominated their OOC slate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: Who is the sixth best team in the ACC?
Oct 31, 2013, 10:14 AM
[ in reply to Who is the sixth best team in the ACC? ] |
|
ACC has two undefeateds and a 1 loss....Pac has one undefeated and one 1 loss team..
Oregon 8-0 FSU 7-0
Stanford 7-1 Miami 7-0
Oregon St. 6-2 Clemson 7-1
UCLA 5-2 VT 6-2
Arizona St. 5-2 GT 5-3
Arizona 5-2 Maryland 5-3/Duke 5-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 7611
Joined: 12/17/11
|
Don't confuse him with the facts.***
Oct 31, 2013, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
I think the question then becomes....
Oct 31, 2013, 10:21 AM
[ in reply to Re: Who is the sixth best team in the ACC? ] |
|
how would Miami fare against Stanford?
How would Oregon State do against Clemson?
How would UCLA do against Virginia Tech?
Could Gerogia Tech play with Arizona State?
Could Maryland or Duke beat Arizona?
I think he is implying that the mid to lower level teams in the Pac 12 are better their counterparts in the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
I see 1 sure ACC win
Oct 31, 2013, 10:28 AM
|
|
Clemson over Oregon St.
Stanford would beat Miami and UCLA would take VT.
GT/ASU would be a good game. I'd give the lean to ASU. But at least we know that the GT nerds wouldn't be distracted by the ASU chicks.
Arizona probably beats either Md or Duke. But it would be a close line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
The ACC is very good 1 through 4.
Oct 31, 2013, 10:42 AM
[ in reply to Re: Who is the sixth best team in the ACC? ] |
|
Perhaps best in the country. 5-10, they are not good. If you matched the 5-10 teams in the PAC-12 up against the corresponding ACC teams, 7-10 point favorites, or better, to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
Sorry, I messed up that last sentence.
Oct 31, 2013, 10:43 AM
|
|
Those PAC-12 teams would be 7-10 point favorites over corresponding ACC teams, or more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19575]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17247
Joined: 7/25/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
And the original focus was on FSU and their schedule
Oct 31, 2013, 11:04 AM
[ in reply to Because of the ACC's lack of depth !?!?! ] |
|
Keep in mind that they don't have VT, GT, or Duke. That's three of the better "mid-tier" teams in the conference. So their particular schedule is even worse than an overall generalization of the ACC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3728]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 4857
Joined: 11/4/03
|
And I think FSU pummels Miami...it will not just be...
Oct 31, 2013, 10:04 AM
|
|
...FSU's typical curb stomping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14751]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 22551
Joined: 5/14/03
|
It won't matter because even if they did it would be short
Oct 31, 2013, 10:09 AM
|
|
lived because Oregon plays Stanford and another top 25 still, and Oregons conf title game will likely be against a better team then FSU as the coastal is garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
They probably will
Oct 31, 2013, 10:18 AM
|
|
but heading down the homestretch Oregon has Stanford, probably a ranked Oregon State and then likely UCLA.
Thats better than FSU. If they are both undefeated, Oregon will be higher than FSU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 11/27/11
|
I still wonder why neither has jumped Alabama. I like Bama
Oct 31, 2013, 10:22 AM
|
|
and I think that they're good. #### good. Better than most teams. Bt overall, I don't see why they're #1. Based strictly on performance thus far, FSU and Oregon are #1 and #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6516
Joined: 6/1/99
|
If rankings didn't come out until week 8
Oct 31, 2013, 10:25 AM
|
|
Bama is a distant 3rd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
I don't know if that's true. I would love to see it, though
Oct 31, 2013, 11:07 AM
|
|
It'd be really interesting to see if that would really work that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [1051]
TigerPulse: 31%
Posts: 3302
Joined: 6/10/12
|
Re: I still wonder why neither has jumped Alabama. I like Bama
Oct 31, 2013, 10:26 AM
[ in reply to I still wonder why neither has jumped Alabama. I like Bama ] |
|
I don't think Miami is a top 10 team. I am not sure they are a top 20 team. they look good some times and horrible other times(nc and wake).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [82972]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80112
Joined: 11/29/99
|
They will but Oregon will jump them back if they beat
Oct 31, 2013, 10:32 AM
|
|
Stanford next Thursday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42549
Joined: 11/30/98
|
maybe, but the week FSU plays IDAHO, they drop back down
Oct 31, 2013, 11:18 AM
|
|
scheduling Idaho should eliminate them on general principle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [931]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1542
Joined: 6/4/12
|
Problem is...
Oct 31, 2013, 12:20 PM
|
|
PAC 12 does not play any acc/sec teams out of conference. At least quality ones. Oregon played Tennessee and UVA. Both combined for one conference win. I think fsu would beat Oregon and I think Clemson would beat Stanford. Not buying the Arizonas, washingtons, or LA schools. Def not buying Utah. One of pac12's top 25 teams lost to eastern Washington.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24670]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42325
Joined: 7/31/10
|
Bama's "big" OOC win was VT to open the season. I guess
Oct 31, 2013, 3:28 PM
|
|
that puts them in a league with Duke. 2 weeks to prepare for TAMU and won by 6. 2 weeks to prepare for LSU. Creative SEC scheduling. Ole Mrs. turned out to be less than billed and AU-Burn is the only other team with a pulse. The rest of their OOC schedule was practice for the third string. They're getting a pass on the basis of previous years' performance and 1-and-done rankings of opponents. They should be getting beat up by the computers but obviously those algorithms have an undisclosed bias as well. By performance ---THIS year--- FSU and Oregon should be the clear #1 and #2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 70
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
