GIVE AN AWARD
Use your CatCoins™ to grant this post a special award and grant the author bonus CatCoins™!

Love Love Love!
monetization_on 1000
Quality Content
monetization_on 1000
Big Fish
monetization_on 1000
Hmm
monetization_on 1000
Flammable
monetization_on 1000
Caring
monetization_on 1000
Nom Nom Nom
monetization_on 1000
Ooo, Shiny!
monetization_on 1000
Hear ye, hear ye
monetization_on 1000
Cheers
monetization_on 1000
Bravo
monetization_on 500
Grats
monetization_on 1000
Take My Coins
monetization_on 1000
Great Idea!
monetization_on 1000
Nope
monetization_on 1000

YOUR BALANCE
monetization_on
A quick note on comparing athletic budgets
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 0  

A quick note on comparing athletic budgets

[3]
Jan 18, 2022, 5:43 PM

About ten years ago I did a post comparing the USC and Clemson athletic budgets. At the time people were freaking out about the perception that USC was making more than $20 million more a year than us. Long story short - that number was greatly exaggerated. All the websites that quote total athletic or specific football or basketball budgets are pulling it from information that is reported to the government annually. It is extremely important to understand that this information is A) voluntary and B) non-standardized. There are lots of different ways to do accounting for a organization as large as a University athletic department. In the case of USC v Clemson, the most glaring difference is that the Gamecock Club and all it’s funds are run through the University. At Clemson, IPTAY funds are not run through the University so are not included in these budget numbers. But it isn’t as simple as adding the two because IPTAY does pay money directly to the University (i.e. scholarship funds) and these funds are reflected in the budget. Without actual line item budgets from any programs you want to compare and any affiliate fund raising organizations you aren’t making a legitimate comparison.

As for basketball, the question for me is whether Brownell has actually been denied the funds to hire an assistant he thought best for our program. If Brownell had a particular assistant who was willing to come to Clemson but was unable to hire them because of willful interference from the athletic director and/or board of trustees I believe that would be newsworthy. But outside of innuendo from a single poster I have never heard such a thing.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Replies: 0  
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
742 people have read this post