Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
'95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 35
| visibility 1

'95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 8:55 AM

1995 bulls starting lineup: Harper, Jordan, Pippen, Rodman, Longley 6th man: kukoc

2017 warriors starting lineup: curry, Thompson, durant, green, pachulia
6th man: iguodala

I say bulls in a tough 7 game series. Tiger nation , what do you think and why?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That was so yesterday.***


Jun 7, 2017, 8:56 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Geville Tiger on Clemson football , "Dabo's only problem is he has to deal with turd fans questioning every move he makes.”


Those Bulls are all over 45 now, have to go with Warriors***


Jun 7, 2017, 8:57 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

what rules they playing by?


Jun 7, 2017, 9:06 AM

if it's by today's wuss rules, all the Bulls would foul out in the 1st quarter.

if it is by '95 rules, all the Warriors would be in the fetal position by halftime.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If handchecking was still legal Curry would be a bench


Jun 7, 2017, 12:57 PM

player

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: what rules they playing by?


Jun 7, 2017, 3:44 PM [ in reply to what rules they playing by? ]

^^^this

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Warriors in 6***


Jun 7, 2017, 9:08 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Warriors in 6***


Jun 7, 2017, 4:04 PM

No Freaking way.....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 9:20 AM

Why the '95 Bulls? wouldn't you want the '96 Bulls that won 72 games?

The '95 Bulls had Michael Jordan in number 45 and the Rockets won the Finals that year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

95-96 Bulls won 72 games and i assume that's what he meant***


Jun 7, 2017, 9:31 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 3:43 PM [ in reply to Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins) ]

Yeah, I kinda meant the team that won 72 games.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

1995 Bulls were definitely my era, but i think i still have


Jun 7, 2017, 9:30 AM

to go with these Warriors. Last year i would've taken the Bulls, but the addition of KD makes the Warriors nearly impossible to defend.

The one thing the Bulls do have going for them is that, unlike many 90s teams, i think they could go small with Rodman at center and possibly defend the awesome small lineup of the Warriors (Iggy, Curry, Klay, KD, Green). The Bulls could counter with Rodman on Green, Pippen on KD, MJ on Curry, Kucok on Klay, and Harper on Iggy. Longley and his backup Wennington would be completely unplayable against that lineup, but they could probably get some minutes when the Warriors go bigger with Pachulia or McGee.

That said, the Warriors are just deeper with guys that can give them quality minutes. They would be able to dictate the matchups because the Bulls would be reacting to who the Warriors had on the floor and not vice versa. The big lineup of the Bulls doesn't scare the Warriors at all because Longley wasn't much more than a big stiff and Green can easily defend him. OTOH, the Bulls big lineup with Longley absolutely cannot defend the small lineup of the Warriors. They would get spread out and killed.

It would be really fun to watch, but i think the Warriors would wear the Bulls down eventually.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 1995 Bulls were definitely my era, but i think i still have


Jun 7, 2017, 11:12 AM

How are you a Cubs fan and pick against the Bulls? Whaaa?

I'm mean, c'mon man. Some homerism is allowed and preferred.

Unless you are "new" Cubs fan -

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm a Cubs fan because i watched their games on WGN from


Jun 7, 2017, 1:50 PM

the time i was 8. It was never a Chicago thing although i did pull for the Bulls and loved watching Jordan like most kids my age did back in the 90s.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm a Cubs fan because i watched their games on WGN from


Jun 7, 2017, 4:04 PM

Me too.
Jordan was a basketball GOD in the '90s.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 1995 Bulls were definitely my era, but i think i still have


Jun 7, 2017, 3:50 PM [ in reply to 1995 Bulls were definitely my era, but i think i still have ]

I see what you mean, but the X-Factor is Jordan. No one could defend Jordan. Here's my matchup Tree:
* Harper (Bulls) vs. Curry (Warriors) [PG] Advantage - Harper, Size, Length, Defensive Stopper
* Jordan (Bulls) vs. Thompson (Warriors) [SG] Advantage - Jordan
* Pippen (Bulls) vs. Kevin Durant (Warriors) [SF] Even, Actually Kevin Durant is a Super Version of Cliff Robinson
*Rodman (Bulls) vs. Green (Warriors) [PF] Advantage - Rodman. The master of mind games, Rodman would get in Green's head and mentally crush him. No-Brainer
*Longley/Wennington (Bulls) vs. Pachulia/McGee (Warriors) Even


Old Style Rules (Man's Game) - Bulls in Seven...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 9:32 AM

Bulls

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

1996 Rules or 2017 Rules?


Jun 7, 2017, 9:52 AM

The defensive stats aren't on here.



badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Warriors in six or five.


Jun 7, 2017, 9:53 AM

Depends somewhat on rules. LeBron cant handle Durant. Not sure Pippen would do any better. Jordan would get his though.

Kukoc was ahead if his time back then. He'd have a he'll of a series.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Warriors in six or five.


Jun 7, 2017, 10:45 AM

Don't even pretend to suggest James is in the same conversation when it comes to playing defense like Scottie Pippen.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Warriors in six or five.


Jun 7, 2017, 3:51 PM [ in reply to Warriors in six or five. ]

I agree Lebron James ain't even in the same discussion or area code when it comes to Jordan.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'll take '86 Celtics***


Jun 7, 2017, 10:04 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'd like to see today's best play under the same rules


Jun 7, 2017, 10:40 AM

as some of the great old teams.

For instance, how would the '17 Warriors fare against the '72 Lakers under '72 rules (when carrying, traveling, and double dribbling were still violations). For all "intensive" purposes, that alone would almost totally shut down today's offensive superstars.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


Re: I'd like to see today's best play under the same rules


Jun 7, 2017, 3:52 PM

I think any of the great Lakers teams from the 80's would give the Warriors a run for their money.
There would be absolutely no defense and a ton of scoring.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'd like to see today's best play under the same rules


Jun 7, 2017, 4:14 PM [ in reply to I'd like to see today's best play under the same rules ]

Today's superstars numbers would probably be higher. They would get to play in a league that called illegal defense on a team that wasn't playing straight up man. All what past superstars had to do was beat their man and they would have to worry about a second defender rotating over.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Bulls.***


Jun 7, 2017, 10:47 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Daaaaaa Bulls***


Jun 7, 2017, 10:48 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 10:56 AM

It's hard for me to go against Jordan. He's like Deshaun in my mind. When he's under the gun and the pressures on, he steps up his game and eats pressure like candy. But when I was a kid, Michael Jordan was bigger than life, bigger than the game of basketball itself. Every kid alive wanted to be like Mike. He was a legend, he was like Babe Ruth, Mickey Mantle, Bo Jackson, a gladiator, batman and superman, a unicorn, all combined in one human being. To us kids at least.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 11:06 AM

There are just some players that excel when the mega pressure is on. Jordan is a the top of the list.

Pains me to say Brady is too ... (but I digress).

I thought Curry may show flashes of that until last year's Finals.

Bulls in 7.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 11:09 AM [ in reply to Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins) ]

It is so difficult to articulate the sense of his super-human qualities on and off the court in the 90's.

You did a very good job though -

That's why I laugh at all the modern references to the "crying jordan" meme. Basically all haters that literally have no clue ...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 11:05 AM

Rodman would have Draymond Green crying like a little girl after the first five minutes. Michael Jordan would do what Michael did and the Bulls would win in 6.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

'17 Warriors wins, '95 bulls too old to hang***


Jun 7, 2017, 11:18 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-willmo.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




Cat on a tin roof, dogs in a pile,
Nothin' left to do but smile, smile, smile!!!!


A 95' tall bull would definitely beat a 17' tall warrior


Jun 7, 2017, 11:23 AM

But it would be a great spectacle. And that bull would have massive bullsh*ts.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Snowflake Basher........Out


the team with MJ wins...everytime***


Jun 7, 2017, 12:58 PM



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Wilt Chamberlin


Jun 7, 2017, 3:45 PM

That's the answer to all other basketball trivia questions anyways.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: '95 bulls vs. '17 Warriors (who wins)


Jun 7, 2017, 5:05 PM

It's a totally different game in a different era. There's no telling how the Bulls would have reacted to the fast moving, 3 pointer-dominated style that exists now, and no telling how Golden State would handle the physicality of old school basketball.

They're both amazing. I'm fine with leaving it at that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 35
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic