Death Valley replica - on sale, 10% off!
Clemson AD says Clemson not on board for 9th ACC game


  by - Senior Writer - Monday, February 10, 2014 8:11 PM
    |

CLEMSON – Don’t expect any resolution to the ACC’s proposed schedule changes until at least May, according Clemson Athletic Director Dan Radakovich.

The ACC is once again considering a nine-game conference schedule, but it was learned last week that ACC officials have also broached the idea of a model in which conference teams would play eight league games and one SEC opponent every season.

The latter scenario wouldn’t affect Clemson because of the rivalry with South Carolina. Three other ACC schools - Florida State, Georgia Tech and incoming member Louisville - already have built-in SEC rival games during the final week of the regular season.

Radakovich told TigerNet Monday morning that Clemson continues to support an eight-game conference schedule.

“Clemson’s position is as it has been for a number of years, that our preference is for eight conference games,” Radakovich said. “That is because we have South Carolina as a continuous ninth opponent and the ACC has recently added Notre Dame to our scheduling mix approximately once every three years.”

The Clemson administration is also trying to protect that valued seventh home game each season.

“We have a couple of priorities here. Number one is to try and keep seven home games, as has been the tradition since I think about 2002,” he said. “We’ve been able to keep seven home games, and that’s not only good for the local economy but for Clemson as a university and certainly for our athletic programs.”

The ACC and SEC will be the last conferences among the power five that do not play nine-game league schedules. The Big Ten will go to nine conference games in 2016.

Last week, ACC commissioner John Swofford told ESPN.com that there "is considerable support" for a nine-game schedule, but ACC coaches had a teleconference Thursday and one described their sentiments as "very undecided" and "wide open."

The league's athletic directors will have the final vote.

Radakovich said that the conference’s proposals still need a lot of work, but that the idea of adding a “conference challenge” with the SEC merits consideration.


“There are opportunities for schools that don’t have some type of permanent Southeastern Conference opponent,” Radakovich said. “Maybe not to an extent like Clemson – where Clemson always plays South Carolina – I don’t think the scheduling arrangements will create those types of long-standing series. But if you take three or four teams from the ACC and then get three or four teams from the SEC, maybe then you can create a number of games that will be done on an annual basis. I know that is certainly an option that both leagues are certainly looking at.”

He then said that fans shouldn’t expect a resolution in the near future.

“I don’t really have an idea of a timeframe,” Radakovich said. “I know as a league, we are going to continue to look at this at our upcoming meetings in April or our spring meetings in May. I know nothing will be implement for the 2014 season, so it really is up to the league to tell us when the drop dead dates are for the 2015 season.”

The ACC will hold its annual spring meetings in May in Amelia Island, Fla.


Rate this Story:
14 votes
Send Feedback to David Hood: Email | Comment
    |
Post your comments!
Subject (Replies: 34) Author
New Story: Clemson on board for 9th ACC game? Clemson AD says no
TigerNet News®
No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
Baltimore Tiger
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
CalvinCoolest
I'm confused. The title of the article says Clemson is
tigeringvegas
Re: I'm confused. The title of the article says Clemson is
allorangeallthetime52®
I didn't think it strayed far from "Clemson AD says no"
jbthe1tiger99®
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
carolinachef
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
lhaselden
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
deroberts®
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
lhaselden
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
tmac9wr
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
lhaselden
Re: No where in the article does it even hint that Clemson
tmac9wr
Did you not see the "?" The title is asking if CU is on
grrowl
Keep the Coots
Tigerdug23®
similar to our plan originally moving forward after addition
jbthe1tiger99®
Maybe we can trade them for UGA, LSU, or Aubie *L****
WolfMan2
That would interesting, but do we want the lower ranked ACC
WolfMan2
Re: That would interesting, but do we want the lower ranked ACC
carolinachef
why wait for sos to leave ? they have won with defense and
sgt tiger®
Oh ESPN is "dictating the playoffs?"***
Mike1189
IMO..
Prime T. Tiger
Re: IMO..
TotalTeeTiger®
Re: IMO..
lhaselden
The "8 plus an SEC team" idea makes me laugh
grover173
because the SEC has faced some pressure to go to 9 games
ctigers90
ok, that's actually a good point
grover173
Re: ok, that's actually a good point
lhaselden
Re: New Story: Clemson on board for 9th ACC game? Clemson AD says no
tmac9wr
Re: New Story: Clemson on board for 9th ACC game? Clemson AD says no
tmac9wr
Re: New Story: Clemson on board for 9th ACC game? Clemson AD says no
tmac9wr
"marqu*e" is an HTML reserved word
grover173
Re: "marqu*e" is an HTML reserved word
tmac9wr
Re: New Story: Clemson on board for 9th ACC game? Clemson AD says no
tmac9wr
Re: New Story: Clemson on board for 9th ACC game? Clemson AD says no
Willyumyum®

Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Sign Up for News Alerts
Features
Updates
Daily Digest