|
Replies: 14
| visibility 3,306
|
Orange Blooded [3521]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3859
Joined: 5/14/01
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [20538]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11680
Joined: 10/15/02
|
Re: Rivals - who landed best 2016 reciever Tigers or Coots?
Nov 25, 2016, 12:49 PM
|
|
Gimme a break.
Higgins is the best big WR prospect since AJ Green.
Ortre Smith could be really good, but best guess is he probably winds up at TE. It's going to be real hard to keep him below 235 or 240 with the frame he's got and guys that big don't usually stay at wideout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15910]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7796
Joined: 11/15/09
|
So why didn't we recruit him as TE? Would seem like a natural
Nov 25, 2016, 1:12 PM
|
|
spot on a loaded Clemson team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9300]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6392
Joined: 11/17/03
|
Re: So why didn't we recruit him as TE? Would seem like a natural
Nov 25, 2016, 1:27 PM
|
|
Because the coot was strong in Ortre
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3521]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3859
Joined: 5/14/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 163
Joined: 9/8/16
|
Re: He say he no play TE, that's why***
Nov 25, 2016, 6:23 PM
|
|
OreTre is a very good football player. Have seen him play numerous times and Farrell is pretty much spot on with his evaluation. Coots got a good one. With that said, he wouldn't see the field here until his RS Fr-Soph year which played big into his choice (which I can understand). I still think UNC would have been a better fit for him, I know he liked them as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38422]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33199
Joined: 7/28/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2721]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2059
Joined: 7/21/03
|
Re: Rivals - who landed best 2016 reciever Tigers or Coots?
Nov 25, 2016, 12:58 PM
|
|
They are such different receivers it's really tough to compare. I absolutely love Smith. I think he will be a stud. It would have been tremendous to have pulled him. He will end up playing in the 230's to 240's and will retain most of his speed. He will be a true hybrid/jumbo athlete and would,have thrived in our offense.
That being said, Tee is a phenom in my opinion. I'm not family with the Rivals evaluators, but please show me 6 better receivers in his class... I'm still waiting.
Tee has all the measurable steps and is just starting to tap into his God given talent. He will blossom into a superstar at Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5093]
TigerPulse: 42%
Posts: 17074
Joined: 7/19/05
|
Re: Rivals - who landed best 2016 reciever Tigers or Coots?
Nov 25, 2016, 1:24 PM
|
|
What an amazing article.
Let me compare the 33 overall recruiting to the 85 overall. My legs were shaking in anticipation of the outcome.
So suspenseful Mr. Farrell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Re: Rivals - who landed best 2016 reciever Tigers or Coots?
Nov 25, 2016, 1:56 PM
|
|
You sound salty
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5009
Joined: 12/19/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9113
Joined: 1/15/08
|
Needs to improve route running according to this article.
Nov 25, 2016, 1:26 PM
|
|
Smith you should have came to Clemson and got coached up on the route running by the best WR school in the business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [35206]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6908
Joined: 7/2/13
|
Higgins, and it's not even close
Nov 25, 2016, 1:49 PM
|
|
Anybody who thinks otherwise should have their head checked. Higgins is one of the top WRs in this class and certainly one of the top twenty prospects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2016]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 2756
Joined: 12/27/06
|
How about last year? Overton, Powell, and Edwards?
Nov 25, 2016, 1:53 PM
|
|
I think Edwards has the most stats but overall best talent i'd say is Cornell Powell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re: Edwards would not hit the field at Clemson as a Tiger
Nov 28, 2016, 11:20 PM
|
|
receiver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 3,306
|
|
|
50
