Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
A Cross Conference Clash that makes sense.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 0
| visibility 506

A Cross Conference Clash that makes sense.


Nov 24, 2015, 9:07 PM

For one thing, Clemson is NOT guilty of taking the easy way out on non-conference scheduling, so this format doesn't apply to us as much from an SOS opportunity standpoint, rather it's being able to get outside of two SEC teams every season with a Notre Dame sprinkled in.

So over the summer, I identified these 22 Power 5 programs that had room on their schedule (we weren't one of those - TA&M), without overloading and upsetting the 7 home game balance, that could have gone into effect in 2018 for a fixed, yet variable, 2-year home and home OOC game pool. This pool has since changed as a number of the schools have announced new pairings for one of those years (Alabama for one), but as a general guide, it's easy to see how programs could throw themselves in the pool for two years at a time and produce more compelling early season (or mid-season) matches.

Ranked in order of their prior 2-year records ('13-'14 seasons)

1. Oregon
2. Alabama
3. Louisville
4. Auburn
5. Wisconsin
6. South Carolina
7. Georgia Tech
8. Oklahoma State
9. Minnessota
10. Iowa
11. Boston College
12. Rutgers
13. Tennessee
14. Vanderbilt
15. Texas Tech
16. Oregon State
17. Florida
18. Syracuse
19. Kansas
20. Kentucky
21. Iowa State
22. Purdue

Some time in January, following bowl season, a committee could get together and assign that coming year's contests based on projections, expectations, competitiveness, history, and intrigue. One year half hosts, the next the other half hosts, so that would also be a factor in terms of who would be assigned to play each other.

Seeding would be best if it was based on groups, like four at a time where a 1 vs. 4, 5 vs. 8, 6 vs. 7 kind of thing was going on that acted as a general rule. If the list above were actually being scheduled this year, you can get a feel for what kind of OOC games this would have produced early on in the season.

From a scheduling standpoint, if you don't fill out holes years in advance you can get stuck with FCS or weak teams filling gaps. But a lot can change over a few years with a program's fortunes, so games that are scheduled 5-6 years out can pan out to be bombs when they finally come about. This format helps minimize that, while keeping destinations and visitors more relevant and interesting.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 0
| visibility 506
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic