Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
USuC 1991
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 10
| visibility 1263

USuC 1991


Jun 3, 2015, 11:38 AM

Always hear how tough the SEC is for USuC,looking at their last year BEFORE joining the SEC, they sucked then also,playing a less than powerhouse schedule.Overall Record: 3-6-2

http://www.databasefootball.com/college/teams/teamyear.htm?TeamID=89&Season=1991

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Other than a few years here and there, they have pretty...


Jun 3, 2015, 11:48 AM

much sucked no matter the conference, independent, etc. Alot of "poor little ole ACC" in that schedule and look how they fared. You are what your record says you are, and in there entire history, they are somewhere around 500.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

hard to belive OT was only recently installed in CFB


Jun 3, 2015, 11:51 AM

especially for a sport that had no playoff system, ties settled nothing.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Best Is The Standard


And they were 2-4-1 against current ACC teams.....


Jun 3, 2015, 12:04 PM

;)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: USuC 1991


Jun 3, 2015, 12:04 PM

Actually, changing conferences was a smart move. If you know you're going to always $uck, at least play in a conference where you can make more money losing!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: USuC 1991


Jun 3, 2015, 12:07 PM

8 years later we were 0-11.

Proof the SEC is harder.

Boom.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


its proof usuck is a big loser and asks the question


Jun 3, 2015, 12:24 PM

why the SEC chose the chickens to join their conference??

It sure wasn't because of football talent or football history....and most assuredly not because
of academics

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I'll go with, "They needed another doormat".


Jun 3, 2015, 12:48 PM

What do I win?

:)

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


Re: its proof usuck is a big loser and asks the question


Jun 3, 2015, 1:14 PM [ in reply to its proof usuck is a big loser and asks the question ]

Their mistake is our gain.

I'm not complaining they chose us.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Smelley, Garcia, and Beecher are going to lead you to 4-8." - york_tiger


didn't know the clucks went 0-fer on purpose....


Jun 3, 2015, 12:40 PM [ in reply to Re: USuC 1991 ]

just so they could chant "SEC, SEC"!

now there's some real fine commitment to being a loser, if you ask me.

and btw, "boom" is only "moob" arse-back-ards... moob.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: didn't know the clucks went 0-fer on purpose....


Jun 3, 2015, 12:55 PM

They thought if they went over, that in the SEC, they'd get the first draft pick...

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 10
| visibility 1263
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic