|
Replies: 7
| visibility 1,296
|
110%er [7971]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3543
Joined: 10/18/09
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
Probably, but don't think he's coming to Clemson***
Jul 28, 2014, 4:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111576]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73752
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: If we get McCloud, is Campbell still a take?
Jul 28, 2014, 4:18 PM
|
|
Campbell's hands are a question mark, I would not be surprised to see him move to safety. And sure, he is over sign worthy, the kid is a sick athlete. But I dfo not see that happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [762]
TigerPulse: 64%
Posts: 3333
Joined: 9/29/11
|
Re: If we get McCloud, is Campbell still a take?
Jul 28, 2014, 4:23 PM
|
|
I hope so kid has a huge ceiling just need to learn how to play wr. Don't think it comes natural for him, which is fine we wouldn't need him to be a stud right away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111576]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73752
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: If we get McCloud, is Campbell still a take?
Jul 28, 2014, 4:25 PM
|
|
I think we already got the top receiver in the country committed, so I am not worried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3422]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 6697
Joined: 10/3/09
|
Re: If we get McCloud, is Campbell still a take?
Jul 28, 2014, 4:38 PM
|
|
True, but it would be great to get a guy like Campbell who's a totally different type of player than both Cain & McCloud. If we were able to bring all 3 of those guys in, the amount of talent we'd have at receiver from 2015-2017 would be embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [111576]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 73752
Joined: 9/10/03
|
Re: If we get McCloud, is Campbell still a take?
Jul 28, 2014, 4:43 PM
|
|
I would love to see him sign with us, although living up to the expectations sammy and Nuke set here will be tough for any receiver. Talent wise, landing this kid would be like getting another Martavious Bryant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3422]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 6697
Joined: 10/3/09
|
Re: If we get McCloud, is Campbell still a take?
Jul 28, 2014, 4:47 PM
|
|
Yea he definitely doesn't have the technical skill at this point in time...but he's also probably 17 years old. One of my criticisms of Artavis Scott from his junior film was his hands. He let the ball get into his chest far too much...however when I saw his senior tape I was blown away by the improvement. With a solid summer of dedication, there can be vast leaps in improvement.
Martavis was a freak physically but never really developed to his full potential technically...that shouldn't necessarily push us away from similar projects in the future though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 7
| visibility 1,296
|
|
|
50
