• Dawgs on their board saying
    Chase1396 - Amateur [32 pts / 94%] posted 4 years ago

    "We are glad we are the underdog, we will show the world we can kill these tiggers" blah blah blah. Shut up with your virgin defense.

  • Re: Dawgs on their board saying
    Tiger6060 - CU Guru [1601 pts / 95%] posted 4 years ago

    Hahah bout to be prom night for that D on Aug 31st.

  • Re: Re: Dawgs on their board saying
    Hoover - Walk-On [144 pts / 75%] posted 4 years ago

    Without a doubt the greatest comment I've ever seen on tigernet

  • Re: Re: Re: Dawgs on their board saying
    Tiger6060 - CU Guru [1601 pts / 95%] posted 4 years ago

    Thank you sir

  • Re: Dawgs on their board saying
    allorangeallthetime52® - All-TigerNet [13828 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    With you being a very new member to this board kind of make's me believe that you are one of those dogs that are Tiger killers. If y'all do beat us with that (as you call it) virgin defense. Y'all are some bad boyzs!!!

  • Re: Dawgs on their board saying
    Chase1396 - Amateur [32 pts / 94%] posted 4 years ago

    Yeah im a leg humper with a 100% tiger pulse and all of my other posts are about Clemson and this is my first post concerning UGAy.

  • Exactly what "they" are saying ...
    CitadelDawg84 - Devotee [313 pts / 82%] posted 4 years ago
  • Torched for the very first time?***
    RevDodd® - Ring of Honor [47412 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago
  • No different than you saying you are going to beat us.
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    Both defenses have huge ?. I can't wait to see Murray and Gurley shred that vaunted tiger defense. Haha.

  • Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    Apparently, you know something I don't.

  • Yes. please tell us.... do you mean...
    TigerGrad11 - Orange Blooded [4772 pts / 92%] posted 4 years ago

    The loss of Goodman, the overall most underachieving starting DE end we've ever had? Or do you mean the two Senior Safeties we had graduate that couldn't cover for the life of them?

  • Well they weren't very good last year.
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    What makes you think that they would be good this year? Same unit right?

  • Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    If this is in reply to my request for enlightenment, your response is about as misinformed as I expected. Our D grew up throughout the season, especially up front. If you think we're going to put the "same unit" on the field, you're going to be shocked and awed.

  • Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
    Tigerman1978 - CU Guru [1756 pts / 100%] posted 4 years ago

    Wrong....add in a 5 star recruit to the backfield mix, along with another 4 star, and a unit that if you watch the game againt that vaulted LSU in the mighty SEC of yours, you'd hear all through the game it was our Defense that controlled that game....and just to think, they'll be even better then that when they play GA...where as GA will have so fresh of one to stop the same offense that left Montgomery, Mingo, and several others laying on their backs by 4th quarter. ^_^

  • Ok, that's about what I would expect a group of fans to say
    GWPTiger® - Ring of Honor [59178 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    on their own message board.

  • which group? the classic underachievers?***
    deadsolidperfect® - Ring of Honor [67320 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago
  • Is that not the epitome of Mark Richt and his Dawgs?***
    GWPTiger® - Ring of Honor [59178 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago
  • Dude they didn't even finish in the top 50***
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago
  • How much could they have grown up?***
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago
  • At least we know how to spike a ball***
    CyberTyger - Junkie [544 pts / 61%] posted 4 years ago
  • Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
    deleted - Starter [368 pts / 90%] posted 4 years ago

    We all know how to spike a ball

  • Re: How much could they have grown up?***
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    I don't know why I'm bothering to answer, but just compare the first half of the season with the second half and you'll have your answer. Our only real issue on D last year was the number of explosive plays we gave up. Time after time, we'd get a team in a third-and-long situation only to give up the first down. That problem was not near as big an issue later in the season. I point to a secondary decimated by injury and the lack of pass rush early last season. The pass rush got much better (ask Mettenderper) and the secondary will be healthy and more talented this time around.

    We didn't finish in the top 50 in defense? LOL. Did you bother checking to see how much we improved? Of course not.

  • Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    I'm sure you do bud.

  • Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
    CyberTyger - Junkie [544 pts / 61%] posted 4 years ago

    especially if it was against bama with time running out.

  • Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
    deleted - Starter [368 pts / 90%] posted 4 years ago

    Saying we should have spiked the ball shows how little you know.

    And you would have been destroyed by Bama last season

  • Re: At least we know how to spike a ball***
    CyberTyger - Junkie [544 pts / 61%] posted 4 years ago

    You made a account just to say that? Did I get under your skin that much?

  • Re: Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
    deleted - Starter [368 pts / 90%] posted 4 years ago

    You mean that LSU team that was highly in motivated, had a bad offense, and almost lost to Auburn?

  • Re: Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
    CyberTyger - Junkie [544 pts / 61%] posted 4 years ago

    LSU would have destroyed you last year

  • And there it is: the LSU didn't want to be there argument.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    You $ECheat homers are pathetic.

  • You mean the same LSU
    tokillagamecock® - Team Captain [470 pts / 96%]
    posted 4 years ago

    that made Carolina look like a high school team, almost beat Alabama, and played in the national championship last year?

  • Wait so your freshmen are going to be studs
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    But ours won't? We have several 5 stars and 4 stars on the defense, but I'm not going to predict anything until I see them play. I like your logic though.

  • Re: Wait so your freshmen are going to be studs
    CyberTyger - Junkie [544 pts / 61%] posted 4 years ago

    You have 7 new starters on defense right? Too bad they have to play their first game against one of the best offenses int eh country.

  • Re: Re: Re: Well they weren't very good last year.
    deleted - Starter [368 pts / 90%] posted 4 years ago

    Ha ha ha ok bro

  • I've already acknowlede***
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago
  • Re: I've already acknowlede***
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    My bad. My fingers are too big for my phone. I've already acknowledged that our defense is going to be young. I wasn't defending that. You're the one trying to make an argument for your defense.

  • Re: I've already acknowlede***
    Tigerman1978 - CU Guru [1756 pts / 100%] posted 4 years ago

    It's not really an agruement from anyone on our defense...the basic thing is our defense was weak in the secondary...not the whole defense, mainy just the secondary (and slight issues with the pass rush here and there).

    We've plugged those secondary holes with some new recruits (one of them being the #4 overall recruit of 2013, Mackenzie Alexander) and some guys that are stepping up better than last year (at least by reports during spring practice). For me, just saying I wouldn't be holding out high hopes that our defense will be like early last years....it's more likely to be like the defense that played LSU or better.

  • Going to be hard to kill anything when your entire D
    ClemsonMike830 - Orange Blooded [3526 pts / 99%] posted 4 years ago

    Is laying on the field cramping come the middle of the 3rd... Poor guys, almost feel sorry for them.

  • I see you guys using that cramping argument alot.
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    We are well conditioned and s.c. heat is no different than georgia heat so find a new argument.

  • My point is this.
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    You have nothing, but speculation about your defense. Same as ours. You can't prove that you will be better, but they may. At this point it is all just personal opinon. By the way Mettenberger is horrible.

  • Wrong again, buttbreath. Do you not realize we return
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    practically the whole front seven and get back our veteran corners? We're not "speculating" about a brand new unit.

  • Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    MackDaddy® - 110%er [6663 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    Secondary.... Specifically corner back

  • Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    I knew you would weigh in with that very comment. If you don't know why our secondary was weak last year and why it will be much improved this year, you don't know your anus from a knot in a tree.

  • Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    Tigerman1978 - CU Guru [1756 pts / 100%] posted 4 years ago

    season-long injuries and lack of depth explain that one. This year, read up...now have depth bult that wasn't there last year, new recruits (which yes are questionable till summer), all injured players are beack to full health, and several defensive guys being moved back to their natural and better spots. Just saying.

  • It doesn't matter if you return every player
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    If they aren't good. Are you guys going to make chicken salad out of chicken crap? My comments were honest and fair. I'm sorry you can't handle the truth.

  • Riiiiiiiight. Our defense sucks. Gotcha.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    Shock and awe headed your way, SocialButtsniffer09.

  • Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    MackDaddy® - 110%er [6663 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    We are thin at cb. Do you deny that?

  • Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    As long as Darius and Jenkins are healthy, then yes, I definitely deny that. We have such an influx of talent coming in our problem--if, indeed we have a problem at CB--will be inexperience. Alexander and Baker will push the guys we have. Alexander just may be the Sammy Watkins of this class.

  • Re: Riiiiiiiight. Our defense sucks. Gotcha.
    FriendlyDawg09 - Enthusiast [121 pts / 62%] posted 4 years ago

    Well you haven't exactly proven that it doesn't so. By the way corner back is the hardest skill position in football. It's nothing like playing wr. So while Alexander will probally be a great player, I doubt he will come in as a freshman and shut ppl down right away.

  • Re: Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    MackDaddy® - 110%er [6663 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    Lets hope so on Alexander. We should be much improved, but one injury at cb..... Could put us right back into giving up large plays.... We are lacking experienced depth at cb.
    I expect this game to be a barn burner....JawJa will field a solid team and so will we. It'll come down to who coughs up the ball the least

  • Re: Re: Re: Do enlighten us as to the questions we have on D.
    David78® - All-TigerNet [14555 pts / 100%]
    posted 4 years ago

    I expect Alexander and Baker both to avoid a redshirt. Blanks did a decent job last season playing out of his natural position. With him at safety Robinson, Jenkins, Alexander and Baker at corner, I have confidence in our secondary.

    I agree UGAy will score points. I expect them to put up in the neighborhood of 28-31. I also expect the score to be very close until some time in the 3rd. I do not think they can match our offense, however. We'll be able to score at will in the 4th. I'm looking for a relatively high-scoring game, maybe 45-31 Tigers. It will be our D which will get the critical stops.