|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11552
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Napier focused on South Carolina, not Furman
Nov 23, 2010, 6:00 PM
|
|
Napier focused on South Carolina, not Furman
Offensive coordinator Billy Napier told reporters on Tuesday that he hasn’t heard from Furman about the head coaching vacancy at the Greenville school, and that his sole focus is on getting his offense ready to take on South Carolina this Saturday. Full Story » |
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [30450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 62648
Joined: 10/4/99
|
South Carolina is interested in him
Nov 23, 2010, 6:17 PM
|
|
as their HC, too? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 62648
Joined: 10/4/99
|
Plus, he's from Mt. Pleasant,
Nov 23, 2010, 6:21 PM
|
|
Iowa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5376]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 9263
Joined: 11/29/99
|
"Fun & Gun" comes to Clemson??
Nov 23, 2010, 6:47 PM
[ in reply to Offensive coor. replacement ] |
|
He's definitely been around programs & QB's that can throw the ball...however, with the RB's & WR's available to us next year, a balanced attack will be unbelievable if Tajh can work out the kinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert [1190]
TigerPulse: 65%
Posts: 1776
Joined: 7/22/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1746]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4362
Joined: 11/4/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29196
Joined: 9/14/05
|
Exactly. Why would he go from Offensive Coordinator at a
Nov 23, 2010, 11:22 PM
|
|
successful program like Ok State [they're 10-1 right now] to Offensive Coordinator at a potentially unstable program at Clemson? Does he have ties to Dabo? Does he or his wife have ties to the area? Surely we wouldn't be able to offer him a significant increase!
Anyway, wishful thinking but makes no sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [58]
TigerPulse: 19%
Posts: 290
Joined: 5/19/10
|
Re: Exactly. Why would he go from Offensive Coordinator at a
Nov 24, 2010, 4:44 AM
|
|
Maybe y'all would hire him as the Coach-In-Waiting.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55251]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58327
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: Exactly. Why would he go from Offensive Coordinator at a
Nov 25, 2010, 2:17 AM
|
|
Coots hanging around on tigerNet. Kinda shows they really don't think their high horses are really that high. They understand that ( I think ) only 4 teams they played in the SEC east, only had an above .500 winning record. Them coot are praying to what ever God they pray to, that the same Clemson that took Aubur into over time. Won't be the Clemson they have to face. And, they know that Clemson has played the better teams the hardest. Ain't that right cootie boy!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [null]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 2
Joined: 11/22/10
|
Re: Offensive coor. replacement
Nov 24, 2010, 6:43 PM
[ in reply to Offensive coor. replacement ] |
|
MIKE LEACH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [640]
TigerPulse: 65%
Posts: 2607
Joined: 4/21/01
|
Napier to Furman would be convenient for Dabo***
Nov 23, 2010, 6:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [100]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 213
Joined: 8/12/07
|
Re: Napier to Furman would be convenient for Dabo***
Nov 23, 2010, 10:15 PM
|
|
Agree..Let's see if TDP/BOD are serious about getting someone with experience this position that matches Steele's on D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
null [null]
TigerPulse: null%
Posts: 2
Joined: 11/22/10
|
Re: Napier focused on South Carolina, not Furman
Nov 23, 2010, 10:41 PM
|
|
Let him go!! Hire Mike Leach!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16327]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 25410
Joined: 10/10/06
|
ooooook...he hasnt heard from furman...
Nov 24, 2010, 1:28 AM
|
|
even though dabo confirmed that furman wanted to interview him and gave them permission..maybe they havent directly spoken with him yet..but the communication is there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26670]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15943
Joined: 4/12/07
|
Furman isn't allowed to talk to Napier directly until after
Nov 24, 2010, 9:42 AM
|
|
the regular season is over. So no, he probably hasn't heard from Furman yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
