Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
2007 Clemson Football Schedule
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 19
| visibility 1

2007 Clemson Football Schedule


Jan 24, 2007, 2:26 PM

 
2007 Clemson Football Schedule

The seven schools coming to Clemson in 2007 had a combined record of 60-31 this past season.
Full Story »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 Clemson Football Schedule


Jan 24, 2007, 2:39 PM

What are we doing playing furman??? That's not going to help our standings at all.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 Clemson Football Schedule


Jan 24, 2007, 2:43 PM

There is not one school on the schedule that we should be scared of, other than Virginia Tech. Even though we have a new offensive line and a new quarterback. If we can get past FSU on opening night, the schedule shapes up nicely for us to make a run, and the only school that we may not be favored over is Va. Tech.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 Clemson Football Schedule


Jan 24, 2007, 2:45 PM

SCARRY- just what I was thinking

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That sounds awfully familiar.***


Jan 24, 2007, 2:52 PM [ in reply to Re: 2007 Clemson Football Schedule ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why no UNC?


Jan 24, 2007, 3:03 PM

I thought it was a rotation of 2 years in opposite divisions?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why no UNC?


Jan 24, 2007, 3:05 PM

Furman, UNC... What's the difference?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Well NOW the difference is Butch Davis***


Jan 24, 2007, 3:14 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

free acc win versus free win***


Jan 24, 2007, 3:44 PM [ in reply to Re: Why no UNC? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Because a victory over UNC is much sweeter!***


Jan 24, 2007, 4:00 PM [ in reply to Re: Why no UNC? ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Gamecocks aren’t ready to take college football by storm just yet. They’re not even ready to compete in their own state – Clemson will still own the territory. Gamecocks fans would be smart to keep their heads buried until that time. Avoid talking trash to a much better Clemson program.” -Dustin Tackett


So it looks like Central Michigan might be Homecoming?***


Jan 24, 2007, 4:19 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If October 6th and October 20th flip flopped,it would be...


Jan 24, 2007, 4:23 PM

very beneficial. I hate GT and VT back to back again.An open date before VT would have been sweet.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: If October 6th and October 20th flip flopped,it would be...


Jan 25, 2007, 2:26 PM

good point

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

CUTIGERTIM
Clemson Rat 1968
Clemson fan forever


Re: 2007 Clemson Football Schedule


Jan 24, 2007, 7:07 PM

Dump the turkeys, schedule ACC teams,let the children play amongst themselves. There are 12 games and 12 members. Or grow some and play the big boys. Also, i find it amusing to have the censor wiggle out #### and then throw a commercial spot with a girl bent over with her hooooooters and asprin box hanging out. Get a life,BAPTIST.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 Clemson Football Schedule


Jan 25, 2007, 8:16 AM

Remember what happened last year when we only had 1 open date. They r football players not supermen. Give em a break(or at least more than 1 week)!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 National Title


Jan 26, 2007, 10:20 AM

Anyone else out there feeling a national title run ?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 National Title


Jan 26, 2007, 3:34 PM

The Tigers defense is stacked with talent coming back this year. Merling, Sapp, and Cumbie on the ends. Scott and Mckissic clogging the middle. A stable of linebackers that nobody really gives any credit to when they absolutely deserve it. And Butler, Clemmons, Hamlin, and Chancellor in the secondary. If we can just find a way to score 21 to 28 points every game, the defense WILL get us to a Championship game. Willy, Willy, Willy!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2007 National Title


Jan 26, 2007, 3:46 PM

We don't give the linebackers any credit because they can't tackle.

We missed Waters and Bille very badly last year. We probably win one or two more games if they play. USC and Maryland would not have been able to run on us but I see your points about the rest of the defense.

Just need to sort out the offense and the red zone problems and things will be just fine.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Offensive line


Jan 26, 2007, 4:24 PM

I agree with you guys in that are defense will be reliable, but is anyone else as terrified as myself about the state of our offensive line?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Offensive line


Jan 26, 2007, 5:51 PM

I think the "zone blocking" thing really helps in the matter of being a little undersized. I think we need to wonder are these guys smart enough to learn it and tweek it. Plus, we got a lot of guys in blowout games this past year which, I don't care if you are playing LA Tech, is invaluable for this coming year. There was a lot of subbing going on this past year so I think as far as experience we're in the moderate range.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 19
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic