|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
11
|
All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:03 PM
|
|
I've seen this argument on here showing how "close" we were to possibly .500 or better in the ACC and making the tourney. Funny how these count as almost wins to you Pumpers... But you fail to mention the games that could have very easily been a loss... 2 pt win over Nebraska, 2 pt win over USuCk, 5 pt win over Wake, 4 pt win over NCST.... So keep pumping the what ifs had we won some of those close losses.... Just don't forget how we could have easily been 13-20 overall, 4-14 ACC.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20182]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
They are, under the LOSS column
Mar 22, 2017, 12:05 PM
|
|
But CU basketball is on the EIGHT year step up program so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21981]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17285
Joined: 1998
|
After thoughtful analysis, they count as losses.***
Mar 22, 2017, 12:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2608]
TigerPulse: 90%
33
|
Absolutely
Mar 22, 2017, 12:16 PM
|
|
And add in a few shameful blowouts, and don't forget the dismal first round NIT game on our home floor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101533]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29886
Joined: 2005
|
What is your threshold for "could have very easily been a
Mar 22, 2017, 12:19 PM
|
|
loss"? Theoretically they all could have been losses.
But they weren't.
BTW can you work on posting in the correct bored? The mods thank you in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [152459]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35610
Joined: 2010
|
Was this not football related?***
Mar 22, 2017, 12:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1095]
TigerPulse: 99%
25
|
Re: Tnet mobile defaults to football board***
Mar 22, 2017, 1:05 PM
|
|
Pretty knowledgeable about Tnet to be a walk-on...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18152]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28090
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:19 PM
|
|
The win over USUC was without their best player - Thornwell. They would have curb-stomped us with him on the floor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [706]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:24 PM
|
|
As Bill Parcells says: "You are what your record says you are."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21989]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Re: All of Brads close losses should count for something right?
Mar 22, 2017, 12:39 PM
|
|
Losing to Oakland in the N.A.T. should count as about 4 losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101533]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29886
Joined: 2005
|
Was that a Freudian slip?***
Mar 22, 2017, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105932]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
Are you suggesting that close losses are the equivalent of
Mar 22, 2017, 12:57 PM
|
|
drinking a glass of failnog?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
11
|
Depends, what the crap is fail nog?
Mar 22, 2017, 1:00 PM
|
|
Typo for EGG nog?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101533]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29886
Joined: 2005
|
Re: Depends, what the crap is fail nog?***
Mar 22, 2017, 1:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105932]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
Is that brand all NAT
Mar 22, 2017, 1:02 PM
|
|
ural?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21989]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
BlueRidge spelled backwards is
Mar 22, 2017, 1:09 PM
|
|
North... wait.
Let me do the math again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [128]
TigerPulse: 42%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
