11 chatters in TigerActive   Go!  
Front Page » TigerNet Forums » Archives » Tiger Board Archive

Topic: FB Update: SI's Stewart Mandel on Clemson and SCar
Replies: 46   Last Post: Jan 16, 2014 8:59 AM by: Sludgemuffin®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.



Back to [ Archives - Tiger Board Archive ]
Camcgee - which teams usually commit fewer turnovers?
Posted: Jan 15, 2014 10:20 PM
 

The correct answer is the better coached team.

The fact is that teams who are well coached make fewer turnovers.

Since we all know that coaching is the biggest component of what makes a team good or not, we can extrapolate the above fact about turnovers and coaching and conclude that that the better team is usually the team with the better coaching.....and better coached teams typically commit fewer turnovers.

In a football game, each team has to survive 60 minutes without doing something stupid and giving the game away......that alone is a huge accomplishment in a football game. How a team may choose to go about not doing something stupid is up to coaching and it is just as important as to how impressive some team's stats may look.

So, based on the above, ON THAT NIGHT, the better coached team was SCAR and the better team ON THAT NIGHT, was SCAR. This says nothing about talent, etc. It simply means that when the game was played, SCAR was the better team.

81 people have read this post

Subject (Replies: 46) Author Date Posted
FB Update: SI's Stewart Mandel on Clemson and SCar
TigerNet News® Jan 15, 2014 11:03 AM
OK...
camcgee® Jan 15, 2014 11:14 AM
...except win the game.***
Topher Jan 15, 2014 11:17 AM
and recover 6 turnovers***
Tiger Woods Jan 15, 2014 11:17 AM
guess you shouldn't have 6 turnovers then *******
gamecock9 Jan 15, 2014 11:23 AM
Yep...
camcgee® Jan 15, 2014 11:32 AM
That BS offsides by Clemson was a tunover too.
Tiger Woods Jan 15, 2014 11:34 AM
forgot about that
camcgee® Jan 15, 2014 11:57 AM
SC also had an offsides that led to a TD for us.
Mike1189 Jan 15, 2014 12:30 PM
On the offsides, maybe, but that's beside the point***
camcgee® Jan 15, 2014 12:37 PM
Re: SC also had an offsides that led to a TD for us.
allorangeallthetime52® Jan 16, 2014 12:18 AM
Re: That BS offsides by Clemson was a tunover too.
MackDaddy® Jan 15, 2014 10:20 PM
Re: guess you shouldn't have 6 turnovers then *******
allorangeallthetime52® Jan 16, 2014 12:15 AM
Re: and recover 6 turnovers***
EazyE Jan 15, 2014 11:24 AM
yeah...forcing those two punt reception fumbles was
tigrjm76® Jan 15, 2014 11:34 AM
The first one was a gift, the second one was a strip on the
Mike1189 Jan 15, 2014 12:30 PM
Re: and recover 6 turnovers***
allorangeallthetime52® Jan 16, 2014 12:19 AM
Only two of those really mattered, in the end
camcgee® Jan 15, 2014 11:27 AM
Re: ...except win the game.***
IvegottheCooties Jan 15, 2014 11:00 PM
None of the excuses for the 2013 game explain the other 4
BentZero Jan 15, 2014 2:17 PM
Hey guys did you hear
Purple_Panther Jan 15, 2014 11:26 AM
clearly
DrDre Jan 15, 2014 11:27 AM
Re: FB Update: SI's Stewart Mandel on Clemson and SCar
kiknchkn® Jan 15, 2014 11:39 AM
Right, but wrong in a lot of ways, too...
camcgee® Jan 15, 2014 12:36 PM
Re: Right, but wrong in a lot of ways, too...
Dugatiger® Jan 15, 2014 2:26 PM
Camcgee - which teams usually commit fewer turnovers?
Sludgemuffin® Jan 15, 2014 10:20 PM
Tell 'em coot!***
cutgrfan® Jan 15, 2014 1:24 PM
#Clemsoning***
OberTiger Jan 15, 2014 12:21 PM
Re: #Clemsoning***
tigerstripe777 Jan 15, 2014 12:44 PM
stop making excuses. they beat our tails!***
RU4GOD2® Jan 15, 2014 12:42 PM
Re: stop making excuses. they beat our tails!***
tigerstripe777 Jan 15, 2014 12:46 PM
You beat us. Period. But...
SeattleTiger Jan 15, 2014 1:38 PM
Seattle - just stop.
Sludgemuffin® Jan 15, 2014 9:51 PM
Re: You beat us. Period. But...
allorangeallthetime52® Jan 16, 2014 12:23 AM
On the conference respect angle, Clemson was second in
Tigers Rule Jan 15, 2014 12:48 PM
Tennessee is better than Carolina
Purple_Panther Jan 15, 2014 12:50 PM
Foot Cuckers.
TigerNation88 Jan 15, 2014 1:12 PM
"Recovered 6 turnovers"
Spook Jan 15, 2014 1:24 PM
This is TigerNet
Spook Jan 15, 2014 2:04 PM
Re: This is TigerNet
92TigerJohn Jan 15, 2014 2:08 PM
Re: This is TigerNet
tigerstripe777 Jan 15, 2014 3:50 PM
Re: This is TigerNet
Tigerluvr Jan 15, 2014 9:20 PM
How many times are you going to post this? History does NOT
TigerzzRoar® Jan 16, 2014 12:14 AM
sludgemuffin is an idiot...
FEEL Jan 16, 2014 12:39 AM
Finished 4th in sec
jmj212 Jan 16, 2014 3:44 AM
Face it.
Spook Jan 16, 2014 5:58 AM
Feel - thanks for the inspiring post
Sludgemuffin® Jan 16, 2014 8:59 AM