Re: Probably because our secondary is consistently more bad
Posted: Dec 17, 2013 10:34 AM
If you think our Secondary has been consistently more bad than our OL, than you have only watched a couple years of Clemson Football. Our OL has been below average to average the last 20 years. I agree on the star ratings not holding a ton of weight for OL, but why are we taking only TWO. Didn't we just lose two OL this year to career ending injuries?