2 chatters in TigerActive   Go!  
Front Page » TigerNet Forums » Archives » Tiger Board Archive

Topic: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
Replies: 86   Last Post: Dec 7, 2013 2:41 PM by: IBeWriteGood®
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.



Back to [ Archives - Tiger Board Archive ]
We should have beat SCAR then.***
Posted: Dec 5, 2013 10:15 AM
 



159 people have read this post

Subject (Replies: 86) Author Date Posted
Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
TigerNet News® Dec 5, 2013 9:21 AM
Legitimate.***
SOLOS® Dec 5, 2013 9:27 AM
Re: Uhhh but we have Duke now too
74TIGER Dec 5, 2013 9:30 AM
Actually......
bowlhunter Dec 5, 2013 10:35 AM
Re: Uhhh but we have Duke now too
lhaselden Dec 5, 2013 12:47 PM
The ACC is trending up.
think2x Dec 5, 2013 9:32 AM
Agree with all of this outside of Louisville.
Mike1189 Dec 5, 2013 9:33 AM
Re: Agree with all of this outside of Louisville.
WP85 Dec 5, 2013 7:37 PM
Per Sagarin SOS, ACC has been historically weak past 3 years
Razzmatazz Dec 6, 2013 12:30 PM
Per Razz, wins and losses should be wholly based on
Shane_Morgan Dec 7, 2013 2:41 PM
lol...fsu is a game away from
GeeVille Tiger Dec 5, 2013 9:33 AM
Replace Big10 for everyone of those arguments, then ####***
OldTiger05 Dec 5, 2013 9:37 AM
would agree with this...it's fair
Tigerfansince1972® Dec 5, 2013 9:40 AM
True - but not that much more. That is what is so very,
Smiling Tiger® Dec 5, 2013 9:43 AM
Vandy and Wake are even????
Tigerfansince1972® Dec 5, 2013 9:45 AM
Head-to-head, Absolutely. Vandy won this year with a
Smiling Tiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:03 AM
obviously that means we aren't even with SC then.....***
Tigerfansince1972® Dec 5, 2013 10:10 AM
Of course - I don't see how anybody can claim that we are.
Smiling Tiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:55 AM
Vandy went 4-4 in SEC and beat Tennessee***
Xrugger Dec 5, 2013 10:16 AM
exactly - THAT is my point. If I understand corectly,
Smiling Tiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:51 AM
Re: True - but not that much more. That is what is so very,
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:42 AM
Re: True - but not that much more. That is what is so very,
lhaselden Dec 5, 2013 12:52 PM
Re: True - but not that much more. That is what is so very,
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 3:14 PM
Re: True - but not that much more. That is what is so very,
IvegottheCooties Dec 5, 2013 4:10 PM
Re: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
allorangeallthetime52® Dec 5, 2013 10:05 AM
Good argument. It's reflective of the 'Here and Now' society
SOLOS® Dec 5, 2013 10:20 AM
Re: Good argument. It's reflective of the 'Here and Now' society
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:47 AM
108 yards from irrelevancy just last week. Now... Mizz?***
SOLOS® Dec 5, 2013 10:51 AM
Re: 108 yards from irrelevancy just last week. Now... Mizz?***
IvegottheCooties Dec 5, 2013 4:12 PM
Re: 108 yards from irrelevancy just last week. Now... Mizz?***
Neutron Dec 5, 2013 4:18 PM
Re: Good argument. It's reflective of the 'Here and Now' society
allorangeallthetime52® Dec 5, 2013 8:15 PM
Re: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:44 AM
Re: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
oldschtiger70® Dec 5, 2013 10:05 PM
Two teams are enough to propel one into the National Title.
cutigersJD® Dec 5, 2013 10:09 AM
We should have beat SCAR then.***
Completely Solid Orange® Dec 5, 2013 10:15 AM
Re: We should have beat SCAR then.***
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:48 AM
Re: We should have beat SCAR then.***
allorangeallthetime52® Dec 5, 2013 8:27 PM
Fsu
Lilnaitch Dec 5, 2013 10:19 AM
This year... YES.***
SOLOS® Dec 5, 2013 10:21 AM
Re: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
SBCharleston Dec 5, 2013 10:22 AM
I am not a fan of the ACC or conferences in general, but...
quadtiger Dec 5, 2013 10:26 AM
Very well stated.+1.***
SOLOS® Dec 5, 2013 10:29 AM
Re: I am not a fan of the ACC or conferences in general, but...
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:52 AM
Yeah, but winning the title the last few years has helped
BentZero Dec 5, 2013 2:02 PM
When there's a "Wheel of Destiny", something's wrong***
MemphisCat® Dec 5, 2013 8:30 PM
Re: I am not a fan of the ACC or conferences in general, but...
allorangeallthetime52® Dec 5, 2013 8:45 PM
Wrong! Look at SEC's record in bowls & vs noncon big boys.***
Razzmatazz Dec 7, 2013 1:40 PM
Big East has a better bowl record and MWC nipping on their
Shane_Morgan Dec 7, 2013 2:17 PM
Re: Big East has a better bowl record and MWC nipping on their
IBeWriteGood® Dec 7, 2013 2:25 PM
I certainly wouldn't say top to bottom they're one of the
Shane_Morgan Dec 7, 2013 2:36 PM
Re: I certainly wouldn't say top to bottom they're one of the
IBeWriteGood® Dec 7, 2013 2:41 PM
And SEC needs more than Bama and Auburn to be relevant***
cupton® Dec 5, 2013 10:49 AM
Re: And SEC needs more than Bama and Auburn to be relevant***
Dugatiger® Dec 5, 2013 10:54 AM
They have 7 of the top 25.***
Mike1189 Dec 5, 2013 11:00 AM
That's what happens when you rise from wins over the likes
SOLOS® Dec 5, 2013 12:03 PM
Re: That's what happens when you rise from wins over the likes
Dugatiger® Dec 6, 2013 9:24 AM
Re: And SEC needs more than Bama and Auburn to be relevant***
allorangeallthetime52® Dec 5, 2013 8:52 PM
NO doubt the ACC closed some distance on the SEC this year
AllTimeClemson Dec 5, 2013 11:59 AM
Re: NO doubt the ACC closed some distance on the SEC this year
allorangeallthetime52® Dec 5, 2013 8:54 PM
ACC is historically weak. SEC had an injury-plagued down yr.
Razzmatazz Dec 7, 2013 1:54 PM
Yeah, and Sagarin is the guy who won't expose his formula.
Shane_Morgan Dec 7, 2013 2:23 PM
Re: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
deleted Dec 5, 2013 12:02 PM
Their nerves are all to helll because they don't have...
ClemsonTiger1988® Dec 5, 2013 12:09 PM
Actually it's been Bama that has made the SEShe so relevant
WolfMan2 Dec 5, 2013 12:41 PM
Doesn't seem to hurt the Big 12/Pac 12
IPTAY FAMILY Dec 5, 2013 2:04 PM
There didn't seem to be that much disparity between leagues
TigerPruitt Dec 5, 2013 2:08 PM
And this folks is why you should care about ACC OOC results
BentZero Dec 5, 2013 2:13 PM
Clemson beat LSU and Louisville beat Florida
quadtiger Dec 5, 2013 3:59 PM
I'm done with ESPN's definition of "relevant".
Wookie Dec 5, 2013 2:22 PM
Re: I'm done with ESPN's definition of "relevant".
deleted Dec 5, 2013 2:24 PM
How so? I didn't say we won. ******
Wookie Dec 5, 2013 2:30 PM
Re: I'm done with ESPN's definition of "relevant".
deleted Dec 5, 2013 3:14 PM
It's a question of competitiveness. Do you not understand?
Wookie Dec 5, 2013 4:33 PM
Re: I'm done with ESPN's definition of "relevant".
Skeeter3 Dec 5, 2013 5:21 PM
Re: I'm done with ESPN's definition of "relevant".
deleted Dec 6, 2013 10:53 AM
How can the ACC improve when the SEC gets all the perks that
IRONCAT68 Dec 5, 2013 2:53 PM
Re: How can the ACC improve when the SEC gets all the perks that
oldschtiger70® Dec 5, 2013 10:31 PM
Clearly
MackDaddy® Dec 5, 2013 3:40 PM
It bothers me and should bother you that Edwards and others
AThomas® Dec 5, 2013 4:21 PM
So says the Bama journalism grad who works for ESPN.
RogerS® Dec 5, 2013 7:39 PM
Rogers I agree with you
jmj212 Dec 5, 2013 7:47 PM
Re: Rogers I agree with you
Skeeter3 Dec 5, 2013 7:58 PM
It's always a convoluted argument except for 'Bama...
RogerS® Dec 5, 2013 9:01 PM
If they had put them in opposing divisions we'd have one***
Tickled Orange® Dec 5, 2013 9:09 PM
Re: Front Page Story: Edwards: ACC needs more than FSU and Clemson for league to be relevant
CUalum79ALLn65® Dec 5, 2013 9:32 PM
Miami is getting there, they have had top 10
Bryanttiger® Dec 6, 2013 12:19 AM
Notre Dame and Miami will be in the top 15 next year too.
Buffalo Creek Tiger Dec 6, 2013 5:57 AM