Replies: 22
| visibility 1
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11175
Joined: 11/30/95
|
Football Update: SI.com Bowl Projections
Dec 2, 2012, 8:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
We dang well better beat 'em.
Dec 2, 2012, 8:40 AM
|
|
That's all I have to say about that.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10345]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12803
Joined: 11/22/03
|
Re: Football Update: SI.com Bowl Projections
Dec 2, 2012, 8:40 AM
|
|
Great! ZERO interest in Vandy. I would rather us just call it a year and get ready for next season. That is a joke. I'm sure the chicken bowl will enjoy having vandy there as well. This games ratings will blow severely.
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [275]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 539
Joined: 9/4/04
|
Re: Football Update: SI.com Bowl Projections
Dec 2, 2012, 10:05 AM
|
|
Go be a bama fan. If I can't win the title. I ain't gonna play. Waaaawaaaawaaaa. Grow up. Please
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2418]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6496
Joined: 11/17/12
|
Re: Football Update: SI.com Bowl Projections
Dec 2, 2012, 8:40 AM
|
|
Ah man cmon. We cant be teased with promises of LSU FU or UGA then get Vandy.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13890]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8805
Joined: 11/26/99
|
When the 2nd best school in the ACC has to play Vandy
Dec 2, 2012, 8:43 AM
|
|
It's time to get the F out of the conference. Wake up people, BOT and Barker!!
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: When the 2nd best school in the ACC has to play Vandy
Dec 2, 2012, 8:46 AM
|
|
If we had been in the $EC, maybe we coulda bumped Vandy for the Chick-fil-A.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17292]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14239
Joined: 12/14/98
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13890]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8805
Joined: 11/26/99
|
Who cares. Hell I'd rather play Auburn again becasuse
Dec 2, 2012, 8:52 AM
|
|
of who they are. The ACC gets zero respect and our bowl matchups reflect that but you are more than welcome to keep your head burried in the sand regarding where this conference is headed and how it is taking Clemson right with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83127]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80161
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Has less to do with what conference we are in and more
Dec 2, 2012, 11:19 AM
|
|
to do with what happened to Clemson, FSU, and GT last Saturday.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83127]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80161
Joined: 11/29/99
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7191]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 20374
Joined: 8/18/06
|
Re: Football Update: SI.com Bowl Projections
Dec 2, 2012, 8:47 AM
|
|
If my calculations are correct,Vandy beat Wake by 34.We beat Wake by 29. That should mean we are a 5 point underdog to the mighty SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13890]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8805
Joined: 11/26/99
|
Did Vandy pull their starters in the middle of the the 3rd
Dec 2, 2012, 8:49 AM
|
|
quarter? If not KMA.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22431
Joined: 9/1/99
|
Re: Did Vandy pull their starters in the middle of the the 3rd
Dec 2, 2012, 8:51 AM
|
|
You have to spot leftie about 15 IQ points.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7191]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 20374
Joined: 8/18/06
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [526]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 723
Joined: 11/30/12
|
I really wanted to see us play LSU
Dec 2, 2012, 8:51 AM
|
|
We got UGA for the opener next season. An opportunity to play LSU in the Bowl would be better for our team - win or lose.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4483]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5995
Joined: 8/11/08
|
Par for the course I'd say.***
Dec 2, 2012, 9:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
nightmare matchup...
Dec 2, 2012, 12:27 PM
|
|
They're good enough to beat us if we don't play well. We'll be embarassed if they win, but we'll get no credit if we beat them.
Hopefully LSU still goes to the Peach.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11/19/11
|
This makes no sense, Vandy is "SEC #5"?????
Dec 2, 2012, 12:46 PM
|
|
When SC is SEC #6 by their reckoning? SC has the better overall and within SEC record. I don't get their calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11/19/11
|
To be clear
Dec 2, 2012, 12:47 PM
|
|
I get that the number is the order the team is chosen, I'm just pointing out that Chick gets first pick, over Outback I thought. And they will shoot for better record and more ticket sales, won't they?
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [810]
TigerPulse: 57%
Posts: 1555
Joined: 8/31/03
|
Re: To be clear
Dec 2, 2012, 1:13 PM
|
|
The SEC # is not the ranking of the teams in conference it is where the bowl ranks in order of picks. SCAR played in SECCG a couple years ago then played in ChickFilA because Sugar and Cap One took Bama and LSU I think - Auburn was playing in NC.
Chick Fil A may pick Vandy because due to who's left of SEC teams.
BAMA - NC UF - Sugar TAMU. - Cap One UGA /. LSU. - Outback UGA / LSU. - Cotton Vandy (because a rematch with SC is not wanted). - ChickFilA SCAR. - Gator Miss. St. - Music City
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11/19/11
|
I guess you didn't read my comment
Dec 2, 2012, 1:27 PM
|
|
I get the sequence number. What I was simply not clear about was whether Chick gets the pick over Outback. If Chick comes first, why wouldn't they pick/offer a better SEC team than Vandy?
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [195]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 495
Joined: 5/9/12
|
administrations
Dec 2, 2012, 1:04 PM
|
|
From both schools have let vhic fil a know they are not interested in a rematch...imo if you are not in a BCS bowl, they are all the same. As a gamecock fan id rather go to Gator bc it is closer. Doeant matter that it is a "worse" bowl
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1
|
|
|