Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Football Player Update: Clemson ranked #7 in ACC WR Rankings
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 3,167

Football Player Update: Clemson ranked #7 in ACC WR Rankings


Aug 9, 2011, 1:58 PM

 
Clemson ranked #7 in ACC WR Rankings

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Player Update: Clemson ranked #7 in ACC WR Rankings


Aug 9, 2011, 2:00 PM

WOW! Seriously...I thought we would be ranked higher than that....That is surprising.....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Football Player Update: Clemson ranked #7 in ACC WR Rankings


Aug 9, 2011, 2:06 PM

i will take that bet

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

SC isn't in the ACC Elcid***


Aug 9, 2011, 2:14 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

#7? hahahahahaha... BOY is that number going to change....


Aug 9, 2011, 3:35 PM [ in reply to Re: Football Player Update: Clemson ranked #7 in ACC WR Rankings ]

and change FAST.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And looking into my crystal ball, I see us higher than #7


Aug 9, 2011, 2:16 PM

No way we're not in the top 5.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


Our returning corps would be ranked lower if not for Nuke.


Aug 9, 2011, 2:18 PM

Hopefully these guys are stepping up or as Coach Morris said, they'll be filling Gatorade cups on the sideline.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our returning corps would be ranked lower if not for Nuke.


Aug 9, 2011, 2:27 PM

McNeal was also singled out by Morris as "vastly improved", then you get guys like Watkins, Peake, Seckinger, Brown...I just see nothing but improvement this year.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Screw Calford.


This goes to show you


Aug 9, 2011, 3:50 PM

What little some writers really know and how the only thing that matters is the final score come gameday, all the rest is crap.

I beleive we will have a good year but in all honesty, who really knows. We could honestly go 12-0 or 5-7. And all the speculation in the world wont change gameday. You either come ready to win or you lose, that simple.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If Nuke, Sammy,Martavis,Charone,Jaron,Bryce and Co. are


Aug 9, 2011, 4:07 PM

the 7th best in conference, then our D is in for one heckuva long season.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: If Nuke, Sammy,Martavis,Charone,Jaron,Bryce and Co. are


Aug 9, 2011, 5:48 PM

vtech being number 1 is a joke they have boykin and thats it. After all said and done we will have the best in the acc by far.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Until we prove we have more than


Aug 9, 2011, 7:41 PM

one receiver on the team that can get open AND catch the ball, why would anyone expect to be higher than #7?

With that said, if our young receivers live up to all the hype, which I think they may, we could end up with one of the top receiving corps in the conference. Basically, until we earn it on the field, no one is going to give us any respect.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 11
| visibility 3,167
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic