Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Considering it's "Let It Go" day, and DT, squared,
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 1
| visibility 1,070

Considering it's "Let It Go" day, and DT, squared,


Jun 23, 2018, 7:41 PM

I don't know that involving all of our capable QB's regularly in games, early and often, wouldn't be a highly effective and extra challenging to defend offensive gameplan. Whole drives, mid-drive, whichever. If we're going to stop for an offensive substitution for any other player, a change in QB could work as well. It takes 11 working as one to win. As along as everyone plays within their game, at every position, I can't say that this doesn't work at this position also.

There's a lot of suppositions to the contrary, but do we really see this often enough to know for sure? Florida won a natty in last 20 years with Leak / Tebow. Bama last year swapped at the half. Georgia last year early season, and O31O State through their run to the natty. Championships have been won with varieties of mixes.

If you've got dudes at QB that can play and help you win, like you do other positions, you should play them.

Early and often.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


off top, would hinder tempo & qb rhythm***


Jun 23, 2018, 11:11 PM

u

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 1
| visibility 1,070
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic