Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: Closer Look: Grading Clemson against Florida State
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1

TNET: Closer Look: Grading Clemson against Florida State


Oct 16, 2022, 4:34 PM

 
Closer Look: Grading Clemson against Florida State

Full Story »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Six targets for the WRs is just completely unacceptable...


Oct 16, 2022, 5:00 PM

How are we supposed to recruit difference makers at that position with only six ####### targets?

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Amen...


Oct 16, 2022, 9:06 PM

Those are WR target #s of a triple option offense-

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Six targets for the WRs is just completely unacceptable...


Oct 16, 2022, 9:51 PM [ in reply to Six targets for the WRs is just completely unacceptable... ]

Well, our receivers do get to run wide open post routes…in prime time. I hope DJ sees them on film day.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Esp. in 4th quarter, when we could have really put the game


Oct 16, 2022, 10:20 PM [ in reply to Six targets for the WRs is just completely unacceptable... ]

All that running by DJ was wasted time, as he averaged just a little yd per carry = ESP on that last drive where we ended up punting.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic