
Wednesday April 15, 2009
Korn/Parker
Korn/Parker
It is pretty obvious that I am not the smartest man alive and I realize how much I don’t know or don’t understand with each day.
I thought if pirates would have been in the headlines in 2009 it would have been because Johnny Depp would have a summer blockbuster. What are we up to Pirates of the Carribean IV? BTW-I don’t watch movies with swords in it. Just a personal policy.
I don’t understand if baseball is a symmetrical game, why is a left-hander often times a better low-ball hitter than a right-hander. Still waiting for someone to explain that one to me.
But one of the things I really don’t understand is the negative reactions among coaches and fans when it comes to playing two quarterbacks.
Teams play two or three tailbacks that take hand-offs from the quarterback. Most teams play anywhere from five to eight wide receivers and two to three tight ends who catch the balls thrown by the quarterback.
We see teams shuffling in defensive linemen, linebackers and defensive backs almost every play on the defensive side of the ball.
Heck, a few games last year Clemson played two punters.
But for some reason many coaches and fans cringe when it comes to playing two quarterbacks.
It could be leadership but aren’t other positions allowed to have leaders even though they rotate players often?
If could be cadence? Rhythm? Timing? But if you know two quarterbacks will play for sure then can’t those issues be worked out?
When teams use the “Wild Hog”, “Stallion” or “Wild Whatever” formation, does that count as another cadence or timing issue? That is another quarterback in essence so what is the big deal there?
I think the main reason coaches are against it is because they want to avoid any second guessing from the media, fans or players. No one second guesses a second team linebacker getting a few snaps but if another quarterback enters the game then look out.
So as Clemson exits spring ball, I ask “What is the big deal if both Kyle Parker and Willy Korn play?”
It seems to me that the coach has the option to play whoever has the hot hand if both are giving a chance.
It also seems to me that defensive coaches would have more to prepare for. Parker and Korn’s styles differ slightly and the opponent would have a few different wrinkles to think about depending on who is under center.
Sometimes coaches try to get the second team guy involved by telling everyone in advance that he will get say the third series each half. I am not advocating this because things change throughout a game. I would go with a much less structured policy. Let’s the starter goes 8-8 for 150 yards and two touchdowns in the first two drives. Why take him out? If the starter throws a couple of picks in the first two drives and the other quarterback leads the team down the field then why take out the more successful player?
Players get on rolls in sports. Momentum is important and confidence can grow or decrease. I think it is easier to find a guy with a hot hand if you had two guys to choose from.
Parker has a rocket arm. He is also a play maker. Why waste a game by not utilizing his skill set and his play making ability?
Korn has good feet, an accurate arm and is a tremendous leader. Why waste a game by not utilizing his skill set and leadership?
One of the key components to this formula would be co-existence. I don’t know either very well but I hear great things about their character so I would think they could get along with each other as this thing plays out.
A two quarterback system worked for South Carolina in 1984 when Allen Mitchell started and Mike Hold entered the game after a couple of series.
South Carolina under Steve Spurrier is not a great example of efficient offenses but I have been in the Swamp when he was still the ‘Evil Genius” and he rotated quarterbacks each play to beat arch rival Florida State.
I wonder if Florida would have won a national title if Tim Tebow would not have been able to give defenses a totally different look than Chris Leake?
Some doubters may ask why not three quarterbacks? How about four? There has to be a diminishing return when you play too many quarterbacks because it takes a lot of preparation time. However, I don’t think two quarterbacks are too many.
I think another advantage in a two-quarterback system is injury. If one of your quarterbacks go down to an injury then the other would have more experience. If you played one quarterback exclusively then one injury can be devastating.
I am advocating a two quarterback deal only if there is not a lot of separation in talent. I don’t think you should play two just for the sake of playing two quarterbacks. But you have to admit; wouldn’t it have been nice if Willy Korn would have been allowed to come in those games last season when Cullen Harper was struggling last season?
Football coaches say competition makes players better. That appears to be the case at tailback, wide receiver, tight end and the offensive line. Defenses usually play several players at each position and it works. We see lineup changes each week and throughout each game. But for some reason when a quarterback wins the starting job then he is safer than other positions.
I would not be opposed to see Kyle Parker start a game and rip a few rocket throws on a deep bend then see Willy Korn come in and utilize the zone read and the play action off of the zone read.
Then again, I am 0-0 as a head football coach unless you count Playstation.
The Brad Hughes All-State Insurance Agency
Prayer List
We have started a prayer list on the blog. Here are the guidelines:
*If you are offended by prayer or prayer lists then I apologize in advance. The blog is free and the prayer list will be on the bottom of the page so you don’t have to read it.
*If you would like to add someone to the list please e-mail me at mickeyplyler@hotmail.com
*If you want the reason for the prayer to be added to the name please specify in your e-mails.
*Please let me know when it is appropriate to take the person off of the prayer list
Those who need our prayers include:
Finn Brookover, Mrs. Kathleen Bowers, Larry in Naples, FL, RTG-Pawsitive Tiger, Mary-Louise Pawlowski (John's daughter), Sandy Wright, Jo Ann Bachman, Frank Taylor, Kenneth Bryant, Pruitt Martin, Got igers and his family, David Rowland, Leonard Gillespie and his family, Jim S, Christine Hepfer, Daniel Rosborough, Amy Murphey, Jack Huffman, Nancy Winkler, Dr. Nancy Strom Morgan, Edward Putman, John Reeve, Eileen Woodrum, Ethel Southard, Vinnie Brock, Jean-Pierre Bailey, Kaitlyn L.
|
Good blog Mickey, though I do think Kyle Parker looked like the better QB on Saturday. He looked more confident and he made better throws than Korn. For all the talk about Korn's accuracy, I thought Parker made some great touch passes during the game as well. He also didn't turn the ball over.
I know it was just one game, but if that game was any indication of things to come, I think you have to give the start to Parker. However, if there really is little separation between the two in the Fall, I wouldn't be opposed to a 2 QB system.
Posted by McRib on April 15, 2009 at 10:23 AM EDT #
I'm not sure where talk of Korn's "Accuracy" is originating. In the Spring Game, he threw a lot of short balls and rarely laid it in the receivers' hands. And don't forget the INTs. Maybe my glasses aren't colored with enough orange, but because of injury, Korn is a FAR cry from who and what we thought he'd be. If there's little separation, then 2QBs seems to be the answer. But I'm no college coach and have no clue what the answer SHOULD be. But I agree, Mickey... I don't see why it COULDN'T work.
Posted by RU4GOD2 on April 15, 2009 at 10:51 AM EDT #
Mickey, I would have to disagree with you. I understand a 2 QB system when they bring two different styles such as Leak and Tebow, Sean Glennon and Tyrod Taylor etc. But if the two QBs are running the same packages with approximately the same style, we need one of them to separate themself from the other. I do not want a situation like the Gamecocks, where our QB is afraid to make a mistake because he will get pulled out of the game. He needs to be competitive and fully believe in himself so that there is no hesitation.
Posted by CJ Davis on April 15, 2009 at 11:00 AM EDT #
Good blog Mickey, though I do think Kyle Parker looked like the better QB on Saturday. He looked more confident and he made better throws than Korn. For all the talk about Korn's accuracy, I thought Parker made some great touch passes during the game as well. He also didn't turn the ball over.
I know it was just one game, but if that game was any indication of things to come, I think you have to give the start to Parker. However, if there really is little separation between the two in the Fall, I wouldn't be opposed to a 2 QB system.
Posted by McRib on April 15, 2009 at 11:12 AM EDT #
If the seperation continues as it has over the last week or two with Parker looking better and better (which should happen as he gets fully focused on football in fall camp) then why in the world would you even think of playing two. Play the guy that gives you the best chance to win...play the best QB. If there is little seperation by the start of the season then I'm good with seeing them both out there. The problem I have is that we have heard only good things out of Parker, be it his strong arm, his touch, his performance in the spring game, his command of the game as a freshman, etc...and we have heard only negatives out of Korn since injury, be it his weak arm, his poor performance in the spring game, his inability to hit the target. I think we're still talking two QB's only because Korn has a year of non-redshirt experience and Parker doesn't...and from what I remember, his performance on the field was nothing to brag about. I'm liking Parker more and more everyday.
Posted by clemson_tiger29678 on April 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM EDT #
I agree with CJ Davis, in that the 2QB system is better when you have two players with different skill-sets. In that case, one is playing because his skill set is more effective at beating the defense as opposed to one playing because the other is not getting it done. USC's QB's were head cases by the end of the season because they were yanked every time they made a mistake. IMO, we will see a 2QB system soon, except it will be either Korn or Parker as the starter, and Tajh Boyd coming off the bench. Kind of like David Greene and DJ Shockely at UGA a few years ago.
Posted by Locotiger on April 15, 2009 at 03:23 PM EDT #
I don't understand why a new sentence requires a new paragraph.
Is it because you are introducing a completely new thought?
Or to fill the page?
I don't get it.
Posted by the_merlin on April 16, 2009 at 11:00 AM EDT #
I agree with CJ Davis, et al. If Korn offered some unique advantage over Parker (like Tebow/Leak) I could see a 2-QB system. But QB play is far more psychological than any other position. You can't compare subbing a DT because he's tired and a QB because he blew a pass. Both QBs would become head cases who would be afraid of making a mistake. Then again, I'm also 0-0.
Posted by Razzmatazz on April 16, 2009 at 11:14 AM EDT #
I can't see a 2-QB situation by the end of the summer. Either Korn will be the guy or Parker will. Not both.
Parker did look better on Saturday, but he had much better WRs running much better routes. He also had a little more time to work with than did Korn. It looked to me that Korn started forcing balls downfield and even developed a little of a "run first" mentality towards the end.
And, Mickey, your policy of not watching movies with swords is very short-sighted. You've written off every Indian Jones movie, nearly all of Quinten Tarantino's flicks as well as the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Personally, my policy is that I'll watch every movie with a sword in it. But then again, I like good movies and 1-QB systems.
Posted by Fluxus on April 16, 2009 at 01:06 PM EDT #
quote mickey plyler;korn will start the first time he gets to campus WRONG
Posted by ORANGECRUDE on April 16, 2009 at 11:09 PM EDT #
I feel like this Mickey. We've had two rotten qb's the past two years. If we have two awesome quarterbacks,why not get the enjoyment out of them both. I feel like we're in a whole lot better situation than we have been the last two years, and I for one am excited about that.
Posted by orangecricket on April 17, 2009 at 07:28 AM EDT #