18 chatter(s) RIGHT NOW!  Go!    
 Mickey Plyler's Blog



Front Page
Sections
Football
Basketball
Baseball
Recruiting
InterActive
Forums
TgrActive Chat
T-Mail
Blogs
Edit Settings
Mem. Profiles
Tiger Poll
Features
Tiger Tickets
Multimedia
TigerNet Store


Monday October 01, 2007

The Egg Has Been Laid

The Egg Has Been Laid

In driving home from the game Saturday I mentioned several times that the Tigers “laid an egg” earlier in the day.

My wife responded, “I have never heard that phrase. What does it mean?”

“They tanked it,” I replied.

“What does that mean?” she asked again.

I could not explain it any better than an online slang dictionary that explained laying an egg as “To fail, especially in a public performance.”

Now the question will be is the only time or just the first time this team “lays an egg.”

As far as what happened Saturday, I think there is enough blame to go around. In my opinion the offensive line did not do a great job of picking up Tech’s aggressive blitz package, the wide receivers had multiple drops (eight by some accounts), the backs did not pick up blitzing linebackers well, the quarterback was not quite as sharp with his throws, etc.

However, the main blame can be placed on the Tigers special teams.

Exhibit A-Four missed field goals equals 12 points.

Exhibit B-The punt returner fumbles at the Tigers 33. Tech is held on the next three plays but hits a 41-yard field goal. A three-point gift.

Exhibit C-A blocked punt gives Tech the ball at the Tigers 8-yard line. The Yellow Jackets score the only touchdown of the game. A seven-point gift.

Exhibit D-A personal foul roughing the punter penalty was called on the Tigers on fourth and 10.

That is 22 points alone in the special teams. But the offense and defense also contributed to the egg laying.

Offense Exhibit A-The wide receivers and backs dropped multiple balls all day. I have read somewhere that the official total was eight but it sure seemed like much more in person.

Exhibit B-The quarterback played fairly well with his throws but the offensive line, tight ends and backs did not do a great job of protecting him throughout much of the day. Tech had six sacks and 13 tackles for loss.

Exhibit C-The quarterback was not quite as sharp as he had been in the first four games. He missed some open receivers.

Exhibit D-Tech shut down Clemson’s running game as Davis was the only back that hit the holes hard but he was banged up and did not play as often as he should have. Aside from Davis the Tigers had minus-26 yards rushing.

Exhibit E-I am not sure what the offensive game plan was. Field position, down and distance and drops had a lot to do with that and Davis’ injury did as well but I am still not sure what the plan was.

Defensive also contributed to the egg laying.
Defense Exhibit A-The defense is placed in bad field position with the blocked punt and Tech took over at the eight but Clemson stops the Jackets until a pass interference call gives them a second chance and a first and goal at the two yard line.

Exhibit B-Tashard Choice pounded the Tigers for the tune of 135 yards and Clemson had no answer even though everyone in the stadium knew he was getting the ball.

In the end, I can think of enough blame to go around for the entire team. The special teams were pathetic and the offense was anemic. The defense played well enough to win the game but they could not overcome the special team issues.

In the first four games the receivers caught the football very well so how could you see that coming Saturday?

Lost in some of this is Tech. The Yellow Jackets had their backs against the wall and they came out fighting. I know it is not popular but you have to give Tech some credit. But Clemson is better than Tech and if they would have played its B- game they would have defeated the Jackets.

Now we have more questions than answers.

Is James Davis badly injured?

Why has C.J. Spiller been so ineffective?

What is the best combination along the offensive line?

How long will the dropsies hang around?

Which parts of the special teams are permanently broken and which ones can be fixed?

How many more back-breaking penalties will occur?

Will this team put it in the tank like last year or will they come out swinging against Virginia Tech?

Stay tuned.



864-834-6060


The Brad Hughes All-State Insurance Agency










Comments:

Mickey,
I would agree with everything except the defense. I thought they played their hearts out. They were put in bad situations by the offense and special teams. I don't think the team tanks it. They will return with a good showing Saturday evening. Thanks and Go Tigers!!!

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=14699>Slabcat</a> on October 01, 2007 at 12:52 PM EDT #


Slabcat, I still thought giving up the 3rd and 13 late in the 4th when trying to get the ball back was inexcusable...but yea they played very well all day in my opinion

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=35293>clemsonguy2</a> on October 01, 2007 at 12:54 PM EDT #


This seems to happen every year, as it has been stated before, that Clemson loses a game that no one in their right mind would have thought they would/could lose. Do you think this might be part of the mentality of this football team? Is this passed down from upper classman to the under classmen then continues to happen? I don't ever remember going into a football game in high school "knowing" we would win. I tried to play every game as if it were my last or if it were the Super Bowl. Why can these guys not do that?

I suppose they do not realize how lucky they are to have the talent and physical attributes to actually play at this level. There are some of us that have the heart, desire, dedication but just do not possess the physical attributes to contend at that level. That is what makes me so upset with this team. Not so much that they lost, but they appeared to have showed up to the game thinking it was already a W and did not mentally prepare.

As I've said a lot lately, for such a smart school, we have a lot of dumb people, athletes included.

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=67061>RobertsonCU</a> on October 01, 2007 at 12:57 PM EDT #


Mickey, It seemed that Maners took too long to get the punt off, was that the case?

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=14699>Slabcat</a> on October 01, 2007 at 01:05 PM EDT #


No motivation.
No direction.
Nothing.
Sure a win against VaTech would be great, but I think everyone would give their eye-teeth for Clemson to win games they are supposed to win while also winning the occasional "tough matchup."
Is this program ever going to turn the corner?

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=758>Shlomo</a> on October 01, 2007 at 01:19 PM EDT #


The block punt goes on Maners shoulders. He took 3 seconds to get the ball off. He took 3 steps which should've been 1 1/2 steps.

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=68377>jgreenaw79</a> on October 01, 2007 at 01:20 PM EDT #


I disagree with the full blame of the blocked punt going on Maners. It did look like it took him a while to get the kick off, but maybe that's because we only got to see it in slow motion after it happened live. I remember the blocker coming virtually untouched to block the kick. I believe it was a break down in scheme and is correctable. But, what bothers me is how we keep making "correctable" mistakes every week.

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=9899>WakeBdr</a> on October 01, 2007 at 02:33 PM EDT #


Just a nitpick, but wasn't it 4th and 14?

"Exhibit D-A personal foul roughing the punter penalty was called on the Tigers on fourth and 10."

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=604>Tiger TC</a> on October 01, 2007 at 02:53 PM EDT #


OL and DL are all soft. Typical of Bowden's tenure. He thinks his teams are tough, but has no idea what is really required to block or tackle with authority when it's 3rd and two. A mindset has to be completely changed.

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=8372>Palmetto 68</a> on October 01, 2007 at 04:08 PM EDT #


I don't know much about Maner's punting style, or if he always takes 3 steps. However, is it possible that he needs that many steps to hit 71yd punts? or average 50yd punts for the game?

Of course i'd be happy with a 40yd average and no blocked punts, but I think I could suffer through one blocked punt in 5 games rather than return to the anemic punting of cole chason. Anyone see the whopping 12yd punt FSU kicked sat night?

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=68699>TigerXJ</a> on October 02, 2007 at 11:38 AM EDT #


Mickey, I tried to read but it was just too painful... sorry man, maybe tomorrow or something :(

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=38199>Dr Claw</a> on October 02, 2007 at 06:56 PM EDT #


you guys are stupid

Posted by <a href=http://tigernet.com/view/profile.do?id=35328>Tigergal27SC</a> on October 03, 2007 at 08:39 PM EDT #


Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

Archives
Search
Links



Front Page | Football | Basketball | Baseball | Recruiting
Account Settings | TigerActive Chat | TigerNet Forums | Tiger Tickets | T-Mail

Please mail any comments, corrections or suggestions
Disclaimer and Privacy Statement Copyright © 1995-2010 TigerNet

Interested in advertising on TigerNet?